The Instigator
IDontBelieve
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Paleophyte
Con (against)
Winning
21 Points

Is the United States covering up Moon Nazis?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Paleophyte
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/10/2015 Category: Politics
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 604 times Debate No: 68094
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (4)

 

IDontBelieve

Pro

For years we have been brainwashed into thinking that we successfully went to the moon, but I believe that there's something more to this. A cover-up. What exactly, might you ask? MOON NAZIS!!!!!! Anyone who has any common sense at all can see the holes in NASA's stories and findings. I believe they are scared of what they found. They don't want the world to know of this. They tried to cover it up, but they left clues. Have you ever looked closely at the NASA logo? If you turn it upside down, invert the color, rotate it 27 degrees, and crudely draw bunny ears on it, what do you get? A SWASTIKA!!! Coincidence? I THINK NOT! I know you may be skeptical, but if you just look over the evidence closely, you'll be surprised what you find. Let me know what you think. Thank you for hearing me out. And remember, next time you gaze at the moon, remember what I told you.
Paleophyte

Con

My thanks to IDontBelieve for giving me the opportunity to adress this contentious issue.

Sadly, I must take issue with his assertion that the USA is covering up Nazis on the Moon. I fear that my inestimable opponent, through no fault of his own, has fallen victim to conspiract theorists [1]. As should be immediately evident to anybody who examines the issue critically, the Earth is flat [2] as shown below. The moon is a chariot driven across the vault of the heavens by the Goddess Selene as revealed in the Divine Scripture of the Prophet Hesiod [3].

Even if one suspends disbelief for the sake of discussion and accepts the utterly preposterous notion that the Goddess Selene would harbour war criminals, her chariot would not hold more than a handful of Nazis. Two dozen at most, and that is allowing two to a horse whilst several more maintain a death grip on te exterior of the basket. This would limit these "Moon Nazis" to Hitler's innermost circle, none of which would be in any position to do combat.

The point is moot as it is patently impossible that the United States of Alexandria has ever landed a spacecraft on the moon [4].

In light of this shocking deception of my worthy opponent, I suggest that we agree to a draw and both concede the remaining rounds of this debate.

<a href=http://ehl.web.rice.edu...; />

[1] http://www.ibtimes.co.uk...

[2] Flammarion, C (1888) L'atmosphère: météorologie populaire p. 163.

[3] Hesiod (~700 BC) Theogony (King Phillip II Version)

[4] Moffet, J et al. (2001) Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon? Fox News
http://www.imdb.com...
Debate Round No. 1
IDontBelieve

Pro

IDontBelieve forfeited this round.
Paleophyte

Con

Oh dear. My esteemed opponent appears to have gone missing. I do hope that he hasn't done anything inadvisable like searching for the antipodes.
Debate Round No. 2
IDontBelieve

Pro

IDontBelieve forfeited this round.
Paleophyte

Con

Have You Seen My Esteemed Opponent?

<a href=http://2.bp.blogspot.com...; />
Debate Round No. 3
IDontBelieve

Pro

IDontBelieve forfeited this round.
Paleophyte

Con

My worthy opponent appears to be
<a href=http://img.soundtrackcollector.com...; />

(No, not Chuck Norris. One does not debate Chuck Norris.)
Debate Round No. 4
IDontBelieve

Pro

IDontBelieve forfeited this round.
Paleophyte

Con

I fear that my worthy opponent has suffered a misfortune.

<a href=http://www.john-howe.com...; width="1034" height="606" />


Kindly vote accordingly.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Paleophyte 2 years ago
Paleophyte
If somebody could tell me what I'm doing wrong with the Copy-N-Paste of the picture into the text I'd be forever grateful. Or for at least the next five minutes.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by tejretics 2 years ago
tejretics
IDontBelievePaleophyteTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made only one argument, based on a conspiracy theory. Pro used no sources, and the argument was not convincing. Pro also forfeited all other rounds, while Con masterfully argued against Pro's proposition.
Vote Placed by carriead20 2 years ago
carriead20
IDontBelievePaleophyteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited every round. Con had Chuck Norris on his side today and used a source.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
IDontBelievePaleophyteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Chuck Norris for the win! oh and FF so it really doesn't matter.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
IDontBelievePaleophyteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: ff