The Instigator
2001bhu
Pro (for)
Winning
8 Points
The Contender
lolwhy
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Is the debate "do video games cause violent behavior" over used?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
2001bhu
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/24/2015 Category: Games
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 420 times Debate No: 68867
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

2001bhu

Pro

hello I believe the debate "do video games cause violent behavior?" over used

R1: accept
R2: make your case
R3: final words

rules
please no trolling, forfeiting, and other things like that

please don't talk about other persons argument unless you put in the comments.

Thank you

you need 1 completed debate
lolwhy

Con

Bring it..
Debate Round No. 1
2001bhu

Pro

just search it there are 10834 or 10843
that is way over done this is all i have to say
lolwhy

Con

lolwhy forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
2001bhu

Pro

nothing to add
lolwhy

Con

lolwhy forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by ButterCatX 2 years ago
ButterCatX
It is overused. And Mr.Why is obviously a troll.
Posted by Hud4 2 years ago
Hud4
Yes thiat argument is seroiusly over used
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by ButterCatX 2 years ago
ButterCatX
2001bhulolwhyTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: He gave better arguments.
Vote Placed by Paleophyte 2 years ago
Paleophyte
2001bhulolwhyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's entire contribution to the debate was two words, forfeiting the last two of three rounds. Pro's argument was all of two lines long and could easily have been extended. As it stands, Con could easily have refuted it had he not vanished.