The Instigator
lokure
Con (against)
The Contender
lionard_dubson
Pro (for)

Is the one child policy in China right/smart?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
lionard_dubson has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/10/2018 Category: Politics
Updated: 5 months ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 259 times Debate No: 107815
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (6)
Votes (0)

 

lokure

Con

Recently, I learned that China has a one child policy to try and limit their growing population. I will be debating from the con side.
lionard_dubson

Pro

i will accept your challenge
Debate Round No. 1
lokure

Con

Thanks, lionard_dubson for accepting the debate.
Although there have been some positive things about China's policy, there have been many more negative side effects of this. I'll cite where I found the information in the end.

1. The girls are often killed.
In China, girls are held as second class citizens compared to their brothers. Boys/men can offer more to society in China; there are more job opportunities for men make money more available so girls are often abandoned, left in orphanages or even killed/aborted. Since only one child can be made, most prefer to have a male child leaving the girls to die.
2. Spoiled Child
Only children tend to have the spotlight on them, being the only one the parents need to give attention to. The child is often over-catered to, ending up being lazy because as a child, they knew their parents would provide. Another large effect of the policy is the children becoming overweight as a result of being over-catered to.
3. Too much pressure
Being an only child causes one to have much pressure upon their shoulders; once their parents died, they would be the only one to carry their families legacy. Also, the parents expectations are high for the child because like most parents, they want their kids to be successful and happy with a reputable career. This causes for the child to be the only caretaker for their parents and grandparents because in Chinese culture, the child is expected to take care of both parents and grandparents which can lead to stress. Another reason is the suicide rates in China are awfully high because of the stress from all the pressure.
4. Boy>Girl
The majority of the population in China is boys, seeing that they are much more favored than girls. This favoring has caused a large imbalance of the genders making reproduction in later generations much harder.

https://flowpsychology.com...

https://getrevising.co.uk...

https://www.slideshare.net...

Thanks for reading this and I await your argument.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by Arganger 5 months ago
Arganger
pi3.14 Very true. I don't believe in population control at all, though I do believe that governments need to put a much higher focus on promoting adoption.
Posted by pi3.14 5 months ago
pi3.14
Still, you could argue the two child policy isn't enough. The replacement rate is about 2.1 kids. It can't be met if everybody can only have up to two kids. This could result in China's population reducing dramatically, and, as you said, the boys would still outnumber the girls. Also, you could mention that there are now way more elderly than working class people, so it is hard to support them.
Posted by lokure 5 months ago
lokure
thanks for the update, Arganger
Posted by Arganger 5 months ago
Arganger
@Leaning
No, for the government itself it caused a worker's crisis. The work force they needed to both support their people, and rip people off was falling.

For the people it resulted in forced abortions, a lack of women, human trafficking, and babies being abandoned all over.
Posted by Leaning 5 months ago
Leaning
But WAS it smart?
Posted by Arganger 5 months ago
Arganger
Due to population losses becoming a problem, they expanded it to two children per family. https://www.bloomberg.com...
This debate has 2 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.