Is theatre acting a step down from film acting?
Debate Rounds (3)
Anyone of any age is free to join. This is not meant to be a statistical debate. Just an informal discussion of whether you believe theatre acting is a step down from film acting which I believe is not ture. Hope somebody accepts soon!
ps. Word limit is 1000 characters so don't think of writing too much!
Thank you for accepting my debate and thank you for your argument. The rubuttals begin.
Who actually wants to see a Midsummers Nights Dream when they could see any popular current movie with actors in it?
Lots of people prefer theatre performances to films. It might be because they feel the film is too unfaithful to the play or they simply just don't like it. And I don't think theatre acting is boring compared to film acting. Both look really fun. However, in film you cannot really connect with the audience like you can in theatre and I sometimes find when you watch a show ive, it makes it more entertaining. And in a way I think stage acting is more difficult than film acting. In a film, if you make a mistake the director can just yell "CUT" and reshoot the scene. On stage, there is no room for mistakes, you make one it ruins the whole performance so in a way theatre actors might sometimes take their jobs more seriously.
I'm running out of characters so I will continue in the next round.
Yes film actors are more famous. But the reason for that is that theatre nowadays is underappreciated and like you said seen as old fashioned. To be honest, it is old fashioned but not everything old fashioned HAS to go out of style. And being a classical musician requires MUCH more skill than being a pop musician. Basically you an be a pop musician overnight but a classical musician takes years and years to perfect so you can give yourself a big tap on the back. Just because a jb makes you more famous does not make you better. Theatre acting is not a step down from film acting- it is just different. It's more like a step down in fame and that's not a bad thing. Some people don't want to be that famous. Sure, film actors may get paid more but like I said, theatre actors are underappreciated. They deserve mre credit for what they do. You have no repsect for theatre actors. you don't have to be interested in them but I'd just wish that people would show them more respect.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by zmikecuber 7 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Leaving this a tie, since it's quite open to interpretation what "a step down" means and both Pro and Con argue past each other. Pro argues they're less famous, and thus it's a step down. Con argues it takes more talent, so it's not a step down. Well, it depends on how you define "a step down" and ultimately this isn't really resolved.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.