The Instigator
BetterJono
Pro (for)
Winning
13 Points
The Contender
Cowboy0108
Con (against)
Losing
12 Points

Is there natural segregation?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
BetterJono
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/8/2013 Category: Society
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,608 times Debate No: 33447
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (1)
Votes (5)

 

BetterJono

Pro

Yes just look at the lunchroom and the groups of people include blacks, whites, and genders
Cowboy0108

Con

Segregation is the product of society teaching that the races should be seperate. Not because white people are born liking white people.
Debate Round No. 1
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by makhdoom5 3 years ago
makhdoom5
well idea is great.
against or in favor of evolution.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Logan94 3 years ago
Logan94
BetterJonoCowboy0108Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: nobody deserves to win, terrible debate.....but lets make the voting interesting haha
Vote Placed by Walrus101 3 years ago
Walrus101
BetterJonoCowboy0108Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: They both can't debate well, but Con offered soup.
Vote Placed by Anon_Y_Mous 3 years ago
Anon_Y_Mous
BetterJonoCowboy0108Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:61 
Reasons for voting decision: This 'debate' consisted of an observation and a definition. No one deserves to win. However, Con used periods.
Vote Placed by Nyx999 3 years ago
Nyx999
BetterJonoCowboy0108Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: This was an extremely short debate, but con wins.
Vote Placed by LotusNG 3 years ago
LotusNG
BetterJonoCowboy0108Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Again, convincing to Cowboy. Only 1 round is not a very intelligent thing to do.