Is there proof that YHWH came from pagan gods?
Debate Rounds (5)
As pro, I will be arguing that the Bible did originate from polytheistic or pagan ideas.
I ask my opponent to clarify who has burden of proof.
The beginning of the bible has incredible similarities to Sumerian texts, including extremely similar creation myths  and story of a great flood . Given how extremely similar these stories are and that Sumerian texts are older than the Bible, it is clear that Biblical stories originated from the Sumerians. And the Sumerians were polytheistic "The Sumerians originally practiced a polytheistic religion"  So the Bible originated from Sumerians and the Sumerians were polytheistic, therefor the bible is polytheistic in origin.
* Creation from nothing, but through the word, dream, or thought of a deity
* Earth diver in which an animal plunges into primordial seas to bring up land
* Emergence myths where the
* Creation from chaos
Many myths also have common elements as well as Genesis, therefore it cannot be shown that YHWH came from polytheistic religions.
As for the flood, scholars see that Babylonian flood myths also share an earlier source. Many different flood myths have common elements as Noah's flood does and no longer view the Genesis flood account to have been borrowed by others (2). They are seen as parallels.
In conclusion, the Bible was not derived from polytheism.
What more evidence could you ask for when trying to prove that one story was copied from another besides having several similarities between them? This is definitely strong enough evidence to fulfill burden of proof.
The epic of gilgamesh according to wikipedia came from akkadian and other religions. You would have to show how God strictlycame fr om polytheism.No experts have shown such a thing. Like where do you see the concept of an invisiblebeing in oth er religions? No where
Stories of Gilgamesh originated with the Sumerians. But it wasn't until later the Babylonians combined these stories into the "Epic of Gilgamesh". So the Epic of Gilgamesh originated from poems written by the Sumerians.
It is clear these Bible stories originated from the Sumerians who were in fact polytheistic.
""As scholars studied the significant differences and omissions between the accounts [Gilgamesh and Noah's flood], they concluded that neither the Mesopotamian nor the biblical author borrowed from the other.", Couch, "The Fundamentals for the Twenty-First Century: Examining the Crucial Issues of the Christian Faith", p. 177 (2000)."
"However, it has yet to be shown that there was borrowing, even indirectly. Differences between the Babylonian and the Hebrew traditions can be found in factual details of the Flood narrative (form of the Ark; duration of the Flood, the identity of the birds and their dispatch) and are most obvious in the ethical and religious concepts of the whole of each composition. All who suspect or suggest borrowing by the Hebrews are compelled to admit large-scale revision, alteration, and reinterpretation in a fashion that cannot be substantiated for any other composition from the ancient Near East or in any other Hebrew writing. If there was borrowing then it can have extended only as far as the "historical" framework, and not included intention or interpretation.", Millard, "A New Babylonian "Genesis" Story", in Hess & Tsumura (eds.), "I Studied Inscriptions from Before the Flood: Ancient Near Eastern, Literary Approaches to Genesis 1-11", Sources for Biblical and Theological Study, volume 4, p. 127 (1994).
"The similarities between the Genesis account and the "Atra-Hasis Epic" do not support the idea that Genesis is a direct borrowing from the Mesopotamian but do indicate that Mesopotamian materials could have served as models for Genesis 1-11, as Jacobsen holds. P.D. Miller also admits that "there were Mesopotamian models that anticipate the structure of Genesis 1-11 as a whole.", Tsumura, "Genesis and Ancient Near Eastern Stories of Creation and Flood", in ibid., p. 47.
Once again, you have failed to show how YHWH not just stories in the Bible came about through polytheism
The bible contradicts itself in factual details with the flood story.  The flood lasted either 40 days or 150 days depending on where in the Bible you read.  And your source claims that differences in the duration of the flood implies that one isn"t borrowed from the other even though the Bible has differing durations of the same flood within itself. The bible also contradicts itself on what kind and how many birds were sent out.  Genesis does not differ from older myths much more than Genesis differs from itself, which further demonstrates how similar Genesis is to older polytheistic myths.
"The similarities between the Genesis account and the "Atra-Hasis Epic" do not support the idea that Genesis is a direct borrowing from the Mesopotamian"
Similarities do indicate borrowing.
"Mesopotamian materials could have served as models that anticipate the structures of Genesis 1-11"
This doesn"t even make sense. If you turn in a school essay and the teacher notices your essay is very similar to some other writing, he/she assumes it is plagiarism, not that the other writing served as a model that anticipated the structure of your essay; that would be ridiculous.
So in summery it is clear the Bible originated from polytheism.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Cold-Mind 2 years ago
|Who won the debate:||-|
Reasons for voting decision: Too many similarities. Also, it is impossible to get so many practitioners if you introduce brand new religion.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 2 years ago
|Who won the debate:||-|
Reasons for voting decision: Better arguments
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.