Is there such proven fact that aliens exsist?
Debate Rounds (3)
I say there are aliens, there has been lots of evidence throughout the world clearly proving that there are, in fact, aliens.
The 4 most frequent definitions of an alien (noun) are :
1. a resident born in or belonging to another country who has not acquired citizenship by naturalization (distinguished from citizen).
2. a foreigner.
3. a person who has been estranged or excluded.
4. a creature from outer space; extraterrestrial.
The one of which we are describing is 4, an extraterrestrial creature lurking in the depths of space, or an unknown place/source. 
Sources (so far)
 My mind/head.
There has been known evidence, such as ancient Indigenous tribes/groups claimed that there is something either out of our universe, galaxy, or other planet (periodical exposit-al)
And, have you ever heard of "close encounters of the _____ kind"? There/That is scientific/expositorial proof there. 
And IF in your criteria, you can show, please remember to STATE your sources, you are not following the guidelines I have written to you.
 - Encyclopedia Horrifica
 - Wiki of Unknown Creatures - Main myth
The closest thing to evidence is a children's toy and some scrap metal. Aliens were invented in 1898 in the book War of the Worlds H.G. Wells and are used now for science fiction movies.
Sources: 1. Cracked.com
2. Ripley's Believe it or Not
 Encyclopedia Horrifica
Astrophysicist Howard Smith of Harvard University analyzed 500 planets and found that they did not support life. Even if there are places in the universe that could and/or do support life, they would be too far away for humans to travel there and know the truth, or for them to travel to us.
There are no proven facts that aliens exist.
Sources: 1. http://topnews.co.uk...
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by imabench 3 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Absolutely terrible arguments from both sides. Any real argument the con had came in round 3 but before then the pro fell well short of proving that aliens do exist, so I reluctantly give arguments to the con. The sources used on both sides were pretty irrelevant to the main point of the debate so I left that tied. I almost gave con spelling sicne pro messed up the title of the debate but I felt merciful. I give this debate 1 out of 4 stars.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.