The Instigator
Transistors234
Con (against)
Winning
6 Points
The Contender
waffleQueen919
Pro (for)
Losing
4 Points

Is this a child friendly website?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Transistors234
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/17/2017 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 446 times Debate No: 101106
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (3)

 

Transistors234

Con

this website has a lot of things that could scar a child for life
waffleQueen919

Pro

Hi! how are you?
Debate Round No. 1
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by NDECD1441 1 year ago
NDECD1441
"Hi! How are you?" says pro
"Oh I'm fine." replies con. "Go post your args oh wait, there are no more rounds left." :3
Posted by somerandomguy98 1 year ago
somerandomguy98
This isn't even a argument!
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Sensorfire 1 year ago
Sensorfire
Transistors234waffleQueen919Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:32 
Reasons for voting decision: Well, ultimately both parties fell short of anything productive at all. However, Pro gave a friendly greeting and used good spelling and grammar when Con did not. However, Con is the only one who made an argument relevant to their case. Neither party used sources. This was ultimately a very fruitless debate.
Vote Placed by BLAHthedebator 1 year ago
BLAHthedebator
Transistors234waffleQueen919Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con actually stated something to represent their case, whereas Pro merely gave a common greeting irrelevant to the resolution at hand.
Vote Placed by DawsonBruno 1 year ago
DawsonBruno
Transistors234waffleQueen919Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Reasons for voting decision: Neither debaters actually state their views, but PRO has better conduct and better sentence formatting.