The Instigator
debate339
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
KingDebater
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

Is trolling good or good?

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
KingDebater
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/10/2014 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 595 times Debate No: 43704
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

debate339

Pro

pro is good con is for good therefor i already win
KingDebater

Con

Greetings, friends!

The resolution is "Is trolling good or good?". Therefore, both sides are arguing that trolling is good.

image.jpg.img
So, the winner is whoever argues for trolling best.

It looks like I will win, as pro hasn't posted any arguments at all!

Trolling is good because it teaches people to just harmlessly laugh and not take everything seriously. It is also very fun and relaxing, and is part of 13 therapy programs across the United Kingdom (1).

Also, it can be helpful when dealing with dunces who think you'll give them over six million dollars just by asking.

Sure, I'll give that amount of money to someone I don't know. The real miracle here is thinking it would work.
Trolling is also very clever (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7).

Thank you.

Sources
(1) http://www.debate.org...
(2) http://www.intellectualparadise.edu...
(3) http://www.SimpleTruth.gov...
(4) http://www.Facts4U.edu...
(5) http://www.Theintelligentviewon.edu...
(6) http://www.IQschools.edu...
(7) http://www.mensa.idu...


Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Wylted 3 years ago
Wylted
debate339KingDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: I was more convinced by con's argument then pro's. Also con had more reliable sources despite the sources being unreliable.
Vote Placed by johnlubba 3 years ago
johnlubba
debate339KingDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: I was trying to figure out how anybody could win this debate, but after closer inspection I arrived at the conclusion Kingdebater suggested, that seeing as both were arguing for the same thing, then obviously it's the person who argued better. That was Kingdebater, Also Pro never offered me much to vote for, meaning my RFD is longer than his whole argument, Which is never a good thing.