Is true gender equality a pipe dream?
Debate Rounds (3)
For example, mate selection.
In a majority of the world, the female has a distinct advantage in mate selection.
The sinking ship and the burning hotel, men are expected to make sure all of the women and children are safe before attempting self preservation.
War, men can be drafted into the army against their will to fight a war.
Equality between an apple and an orange is a difficult task to judge.
83% of the time, custody goes to the mother.
57% of the time woman has custody, she is awarded child support.
40% of the time custody goes to the father, he is awarded child support
As a result of all of these biases against fathers, the percentage of all child support dollars paid is extremely biased. Roughly 90% of all child support dollars received are received by mothers
I argue that equality shouldn't even be the goal, but harmony would make life better for both sexes.
I wish to make my point of argument very clear. True gender equality does not imply bra burning. It means empowerment of women so that they may more constructively contribute to society. Women are anatomically and genetically different from men. When I talk about gender equality it does not imply that women should run the 100 meters along with men. Nor should they replace their XX chromosomes with XY. What I mean is atrocities (like female infanticide, pre-natal sex selection, denial of women's rights, improper women's education, poor women's health, crimes against women like rape and molestation etc. ) should end? But is this possible in today's world? How many people are truly interested in women's rights?
Women are not considered biologically inferior...
There are facts of life, such as men being physically superior than women. Women being inter socially superior to men. Women have evolved to be more detail oriented whereas men have evolved to be more focused on "the BIG job".
There is a natural order to things, predators feed on their prey. Life isn't always 100% fair.
Women have more control in the dating scene. They get to choose their mate where men have to compete to be chosen.
You seem narrowly focused on women's rights, not equality.
There are definitely areas where men are at an unfair disadvantage, Ignoring those areas while focusing only on women's rights does not promote equality. That only serves to breed resentment between the sexes. True equality would be to focus on everyone rights regardless of sex.
All of the links you provided are narrowly focused on third world countries where things are skewed in favor of men, in western countries it is quite the opposite.
If a man and woman get in a fight, they automatically arrest the man unless there are witnesses.
Egalitarianism is a much better goal to seek than "women's rights".
This is not true.
See the statistics for Europe, for instance.
It shows the stats are skewed disproportionately in the favor of men.
Also look at some key occupational statistics :
1) IT - http://www.techrepublic.com...
The numbers are very low.
This link illustrates that only 30% of European researchers are women.
Does this not prove that there is a lot of ground to be covered in matters of true gender parity?
This is not just a Third World phenomenon. It is a global pandemic and needs to be addressed as such.
This is my stand.
Smart girls marry for money.
These are choices that men almost never have the option of making.
Its actually very rare these days for societal oppression of women, outside of 3rd world countries.
The statistics pointing to lower rates of women in all these career paths are mostly because women have the choices to stay at home as mom, or marry for money like a Prada. Men simply don't have these choices.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.