The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
4 Points

Is trump a booly

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/4/2016 Category: Funny
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 544 times Debate No: 94426
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)




I believe trump is a meany booly because he insults people is a bad influence and is generally mean. He also is racist towards Muslims And mexicans. He insults people with disabilities and had absolutely no policies except build a wall. He is unfit for presidency and is not what we want to be our nations representation and we don't want him as a role model. He is a mean bully of a person. Trump for Detention 2016 With the principal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Seeing as my opponent only allows a maximum of 500 characters, I will be brief.
1. Many people insulted by Trump attacked him first.
2. People who personally know Trump don't think he's mean, like Rudy Giuliani.
3. You can't be 'racist' towards Muslims (religion) and Mexicans (nationality). His plans target illegal immigrants and radical Islamic terrorists only anyway.
4. His website lists policies like healthcare, taxes, gun rights, etc.
5. America needs a strong outsider leader.
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Commondebator 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro provided no arguments whatsoever, and con had much better reasoning. Plus, Pro's grammar was off