The Instigator
donromantikokarvisu07
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
katchabeswaransriram
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Is war needed as a counter-attack to terrorism?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/27/2015 Category: Politics
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 440 times Debate No: 83119
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (0)

 

donromantikokarvisu07

Pro

This argument remains to be unstable until it is concluded. As we all know, the ISIS, ISIL, Al Qaeda, Abu Sayyaf and other terrorist groups continues to create chaotic impulse in the world today. Recently, Paris was attacked by the group ISIS and as a counter-attack, France declared war unto them. The cyber hackers "Anonymous" also shutted thousands of allegedly ISIS social media accounts and released names of suspects. Russia continues to bomb the ISIS boundaries in Syria.

Now, as a follower of an extreme method of Reformation, I stand with the side of "War is necessary to prevent and to stop terrorism". For me, diplomatic process is just a waste of time and effort. Preventing the terrorists from spreading bloody revolutions for what some call as " Holy War". Providing a historical fact that even before, the Roman Catholics conducted "Crusades" in the Middle East to hold a war against the rebellious Muslims. Also in history, we are all aware that goals were attained before through rebellions and not through bloodless acts.

What is your stand in this issue?
katchabeswaransriram

Con

I am totally against conducting war on terrorism. I do accept the fact that Paris was destructed by terrorists and terrorists need to be punished for sure. But, practically thinking to conduct a war is not an end or solution for terrorism. In fact terrorism would get increased if war is conducted. As we mention that war is being conducted by other countries on other countries can never stop terrorism as a whole. For example when Russia constantly bombs the boundaries of Syria maybe few terrorists may die but eventually the common people residing over the boundaries of the country gets affected really. To be honest now I put forward a Question: What's the use of raging a war against these common people who never entered into the picture of what so called terrorism? Always Human Ethical Law should be 100 Criminals can be let walked out free but not a single innocent should be wrongly convicted for what he has not done. So, I conclude by saying believing the legal system and making terrorists punish under the Law can help counter attck terrorism and not by raging war and killing Thousands of innocent people.
Debate Round No. 1
donromantikokarvisu07

Pro

donromantikokarvisu07 forfeited this round.
katchabeswaransriram

Con

katchabeswaransriram forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
donromantikokarvisu07

Pro

donromantikokarvisu07 forfeited this round.
katchabeswaransriram

Con

katchabeswaransriram forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Reformist 1 year ago
Reformist
Well war created ISIS

So no

More war isn't the answer lel
Posted by nomu01 1 year ago
nomu01
Actually, I would just like to point out that ISIS is NOT Islam. Muslims do NOT support ISIS. Use your common sense, if ISIS was Islamic, why would they attack Islamic based countries like the countries in the middle east?? @vi_spex
Posted by vi_spex 1 year ago
vi_spex
if the enemy is islam then yes it is necessary
No votes have been placed for this debate.