Is world war 3 going to destroy the world first, before the earthquake destroys the world?
Debate Rounds (3)
Before we start, I have 2 points I'd like to address.
(1)The first is the argument you gave is a logical fallacy of Limited Choice (False Dichotomy)
(2)The second is more for clarification of your previous argument. What earthquake are you referring to? What do mean by "destroys the world"; like obliterates it into stardust, be made inhospitable, or something else?
No matter the clarification, I promise to continue the debate and argue how world war 3 won't be what "destroys the planet"
Ok one, really and what do you mean?
2. I mean like if world war 3 happens before the earthquake, it would put the world into chaos. Everyone would be at each others throat. World war 3 would bring chaos and disaster to the entire world. Also I mean the big earthquake, the one that people say is going to happen soon.
I tried to find the earthquake that is "...the big earthquake, the one that people say is going to happen soon.", and couldn't find anything. But I would say
PrincessMizukiAshiya forfeited this round.
Hero_Liberator forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by daem0n 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||5|
Reasons for voting decision: Arguments: I do not even know what earthquake Pro is referring to. I cannot vote for a resolution if I do not know what it means. Sources: only Con cites any.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.