The Instigator
ASB
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Pastafarian
Con (against)
Winning
22 Points

It is Possible That God Can Exist

Do you like this debate?NoYes-4
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/10/2011 Category: Science
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,024 times Debate No: 14738
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (9)
Votes (6)

 

ASB

Pro

It is possible that God can exist.
Pastafarian

Con

This depends on which God. There are currently no evidence that there is a God, other than the bible.
Debate Round No. 1
ASB

Pro

ASB forfeited this round.
Pastafarian

Con

The Flying Spaghetti Monster will kill me will his noodly appendages if I say this but there is no God.

First of all, notice that there isn't any scientific evidence proving towards a God.

EVIDENCE ONE:
First of all, "God answers prayers" is human imagination. Back in 2006, they had a study of terminally ill patients and asked half of them to pray, and the other half to not pray. At the end, both groups still died even though half of them prayed.

I will post one reason in each debate..

CHEERS, MATE I HOPE YOU RETURN.
Debate Round No. 2
ASB

Pro

ASB forfeited this round.
Pastafarian

Con

Vote for CON because PRO didn't do anything.
Debate Round No. 3
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by maninorange 6 years ago
maninorange
Possible... yes...
Improbable... also yes.
Posted by GeoLaureate8 6 years ago
GeoLaureate8
@wjmelements

Agreed. Con FAIL.
Posted by mongeese 6 years ago
mongeese
Well, this is...
...
:|
:?
::/
Negative proof fallacy?
Posted by wjmelements 6 years ago
wjmelements
The lack of evidence doesn't denote impossibility.
Posted by tigg13 6 years ago
tigg13
Exactly which God are you referring to?
Posted by LaissezFaire 6 years ago
LaissezFaire
Someone should take this and define 'God' as something impossible.
Posted by GeoLaureate8 6 years ago
GeoLaureate8
Not possible.

/End
Posted by ASB 6 years ago
ASB
I guess so.
hahaha
Posted by mistavega 6 years ago
mistavega
this should be interesting, or at least entertaining.
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by NiamC 2 years ago
NiamC
ASBPastafarianTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
ASBPastafarianTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro failed to quell the burden of proof. Conduct to Con due to the forfeits.
Vote Placed by CapsLock 5 years ago
CapsLock
ASBPastafarianTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro Forfeited
Vote Placed by maninorange 6 years ago
maninorange
ASBPastafarianTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Vote Placed by Green_Man 6 years ago
Green_Man
ASBPastafarianTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 6 years ago
Cliff.Stamp
ASBPastafarianTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04