The Instigator
MASTERY
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points
The Contender
Dufflepud
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points

It is morally and ethically right to steal both big and small.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
MASTERY
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/15/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 456 times Debate No: 49169
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)

 

MASTERY

Con

Welcome to the debate.

First round is for defining and last round is for conclusions. I define "morally and ethically" as "concerned with the principles of right and wrong behaviour". I define "steal" as "take (another person's property) without permission or legal right and without intending to return it". I define "big" as "monetarily expensive" and "small" as "monetarily inexpensive". Any direct and indirect results of stealing (such as revenge) are NOT counted as stealing, UNLESS it is stealing. However, the direct and indirect results can be used as arguments.

Please use Google to define words. Type in "Define WordHere". Replace WordHere with the word you wish to define.

Thank you.
Dufflepud

Pro

I sincerely apologize, I didn't realize that you were taking the role of Con. Feel free to repost this debate.
Debate Round No. 1
MASTERY

Con

No problem.
Dufflepud

Pro

Dufflepud forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
MASTERY

Con

Just a reminder, make sure that you check the pro/con not just assume the instigator is pro.
Dufflepud

Pro

Dufflepud forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Dufflepud

Pro

Dufflepud forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
Dufflepud

Pro

Dufflepud forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by ZebramZee 3 years ago
ZebramZee
Are you counting government taxes as stealing?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Dakota-Hiltzman 3 years ago
Dakota-Hiltzman
MASTERYDufflepudTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit. Mastery, if you want to have this debate again I'm up for a go. Send me a challenge.