It will be beneficial for a country if citizens can to do ANYTHING they want so long as...
Debate Rounds (3)
1) It doesn't harm anyone (humans) or anything (e.g companies, animals, society, economy e.t.c)
2) Offending someone or hurting someones feelings through free speech or an action does not count as "harm" in my definition
3) i.e there are no victims
And I propose such a law would be beneficial for the country.
I say this on the grounds that if such a law was applied then there would no longer be ANYONE going to jail for victim less crimes, which leads to injustice and bitterness, which could lead to civil war and hate. (imprisoning mandela and martin luther king for a victimless crime almost lead to civil war. Victimless crimes almost always cause divisions and problems like this)
Some victimless crimes which lead people to prison these days are:
1) Growing a Marijuana plant in your garden (illegal in many countries)
2) Smoking Marijuana in your own home with nobody around (illegal in many countries)
3) Using tinted windows (crime in some EU countries)
4) Living in your car when homeless (considered a crime in USA)
5) Not wearing a headscarf (crime in many Muslim countries)
To summarise I feel all victim less crimes should be made legal and this would be beneficial for the country and its citizens. I am open minded and want to know if my stance is wrong through a debate.
**I would like to debate someone who supports punishing those who commit what I perceive as victimless crimes**
You see, we are not perfect, we get devoured by temptations, we make mistakes and we do stupid stuff.
Even if those rules don't affect others, temptation and greediness and other bad factors will come and make use corrupt.
People are still doing bad even with these rules so how can limiting the rules and laws make things any better?
It's like an communist country, if the leader is perfect and the leader is great and smart, the country will develop fast and strong than other countries, but if the leader is greedy and corrupted, the whole country will be corrupted. We are like that corrupted leader, even if we get the stuff we want, we still want more, we're greedy, we want to rule, if more laws are destroyed, the society will be destroyed too.
Think about it, US government gave people freedom to own personal guns and what do many people do? Shoot and murder. This happens everywhere too. Look at other countries who doesn't allow personal guns, there's barely any murder by guns, bank robbery and stuff. That's just an example. Now think about what will happen if the government let people grow weeds and boos in their home, instead of just smoking it alone without any people around, temptation will control us and make us do bad stuff with them, that's even happening right now, some people are putting drugs inside school food and restaurants and stuff, what will happen if they legalize the big trouble? More trouble will come. We're corrupt, we can't control stuff, we're sinners, even if it's a law to not do stuff, people do it because they're crazy, and there would be more crazy people if you delete all those laws.
1) September 2017- UK makes it illegal to claim "Islam is an evil religion, Muhammad was a terrorist" online, and it is considered hate speech/trolling
2) September 2018 By now 1000+ people in Jail for speaking their mind about Islam
3) September 2019- Many of those jailed are released from Jail and begin to protest and act violently against Muslims. Some of them jailed were also famous people like Nelson Mandela. A civil war erupts. Civil disturbances and rioting everywhere.
Imagine this scenario:
1) If you are black you must ride on the back of a bus, if you ride in the front you go to jail (this was a law in the usa in the 1960's)
2) Many people protested and many were put in Jail. This almost led to civil wars.
Do you not see how many scenarios there have been throughout history were victimless crimes have led to brutal wars and violence?
peacenik forfeited this round.
FPSKorea1 forfeited this round.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.