The Instigator
Wnope
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Hardcore.Pwnography
Con (against)
Winning
10 Points

It'd be fun to vote on DDO

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Hardcore.Pwnography
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/14/2012 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,203 times Debate No: 20364
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (9)
Votes (3)

 

Wnope

Pro

I don't debate, but I wouldn't mind voting for once. Just type something so I can start voting on things.

Hardcore.Pwnography

Con

Resolved: It would be fun to vote on DDO.

Pro has not fulfilled his BOP, he did not prove why it would be fun to vote.

As Con, I will prove that voting on DDO is not fun.

1. You have to give a lot of reasons or people get mad. That is a lot of work.
2. You have to read through the entire debate to give a fair vote. Some debates are extremely long. Like this one:

http://www.debate.org...

It would take so much effort to read through all the stories to give a fair vote.

Therefore it is not fun to vote on DDO.
Therefore, I have won, as Pro has proved nothing.

Vote Con.


Debate Round No. 1
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by K.GKevinGeary 4 years ago
K.GKevinGeary
I think that is a bit ridiculous to ban someone for inflating his debate count to three. DDO will be just fine.
Posted by vmpire321 5 years ago
vmpire321
"Real" debates? Who determines what is considered a real debate or not?

I've seen some word debates.

I've seen some story debates.

I've seen some debates whereas they don't really debate - but rather get together and create a 'storyline'.

I've seen some pretty random debates.

**** isn't being done about these debates.
Posted by debateme 5 years ago
debateme
That's the point. You have to do 3 real debates to vote. It's a rule. Since you are breaking it, you should be banned.
Posted by Wnope 5 years ago
Wnope
You find a way to get me to vote without having to do three debates, I won't inflate my debate count to three.
Posted by debateme 5 years ago
debateme
That's not what I said. I said "inflating his debate count".
Posted by Wnope 5 years ago
Wnope
I'm going to be banned for inflating my win account...with losses?
Posted by debateme 5 years ago
debateme
Wnope should be banned for inflating his debate count.
Posted by Wnope 5 years ago
Wnope
Just type three or four words so I can get voting privileges.
Posted by TheAtheistAllegiance 5 years ago
TheAtheistAllegiance
Is this debate intended to be serious or for fun? I don't have enough free time to commit to a serious debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Maikuru 5 years ago
Maikuru
WnopeHardcore.PwnographyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Only Con provided arguments, which were actually true.
Vote Placed by imabench 5 years ago
imabench
WnopeHardcore.PwnographyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: con only showed its not fun to vote on some debates, but yeah pro didnt have any arguments and really only used this debate for voting provlidges, which sort of itself explains why he didnt have any arguments since he actually COULDNT vote beforehand.... whatever...
Vote Placed by phantom 5 years ago
phantom
WnopeHardcore.PwnographyTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro made no arguments (not that he wanted too).