The Instigator
beatmaster2012
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
RyozoTabikashi
Pro (for)
Winning
13 Points

It's a sin not to share Jesus on Facebook.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
RyozoTabikashi
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/23/2012 Category: Religion
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,410 times Debate No: 23085
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (10)
Votes (4)

 

beatmaster2012

Con

waiting for acceptance..
RyozoTabikashi

Pro

i accept your arguement with the understanding that i am saying it is not a sin to not post jesus on facebook
Debate Round No. 1
beatmaster2012

Con

You're pro. So you must convince us that it is a sin. You can start. Good luck.
RyozoTabikashi

Pro

ok I will start this party.
I believe that not sharing Jesus on facebook is a sin because when we get saved, then baptised, Jesus command us to lead others to him. therefore what better place to lead people to him than where all your friends are at. that's right I am talking about posting it on facebook. now their is a big difference between being nice and casual about it, and hounding people to get saved and going to church.
I believe that on judgement day when you do die and go to heaven, God will judge you on the instances you had to lead people to him. it is our duty to lead people and that is my grounds that I stand on. it is his command and being a believer I will do everything I can to let people know about him
Debate Round No. 2
beatmaster2012

Con

Interdasting point you have there.

But let's take this a step further. Considering that there are only whiney teenage girls on facebook who actually share Jesus, takes down the reputation of Jesus since he only has teenage girls to follow him.
Next thing Jesus will respawn as a 16 year old boy with a gay haircut and all sing sh*tty songs. Imagine that happening!

My conclusion is that sharing Jesus on FB will damage the reputation of christianity because of the stupid little girls.
RyozoTabikashi

Pro

hmmm okay lets go a step further than that. idk if you have heard Matt McCoy, a Christian rock band singer, or Michael Jr. a Christian comedian, but they both have little girl followers and they talk about Jesus trying to get him followers. my point in bringing them up is the fact that they are on facebook with many girls following them and they haven't downgraded Jesus. point being that little girls or teenage girls as you put it in my opinion won't affect the view of Jesus thus my argument still stands.
Debate Round No. 3
10 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Koopin 5 years ago
Koopin
Pro, do you believe this?
Posted by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
You have a point.
Posted by Mestari 5 years ago
Mestari
To go ultra-evangelican... or to troll... Aren't they the same thing?
Posted by Koopin 5 years ago
Koopin
No one believes it. Not even extreme Christians.
Posted by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
One messed up resolution.
Posted by Koopin 5 years ago
Koopin
Anyone who takes this has to troll in order to win.
Posted by beatmaster2012 5 years ago
beatmaster2012
What does it look like?
Posted by Zaradi 5 years ago
Zaradi
The heck...?
Posted by Koopin 5 years ago
Koopin
What is this about Con?
Posted by Koopin 5 years ago
Koopin
What?
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Multi_Pyrocytophage 5 years ago
Multi_Pyrocytophage
beatmaster2012RyozoTabikashiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: He made better arguments, quite frankly, although it seems both sides would have done better with a higher character limit.
Vote Placed by Travniki 5 years ago
Travniki
beatmaster2012RyozoTabikashiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Bleh debate
Vote Placed by Koopin 5 years ago
Koopin
beatmaster2012RyozoTabikashiTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: lol
Vote Placed by imabench 5 years ago
imabench
beatmaster2012RyozoTabikashiTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: pro did not make any convincing arguments at all but they were still much better than the con's arguments. Arguments to the pro, spelling to the pro