The Instigator
Max.Wallace
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
David_Debates
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

I've been traumatized.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/25/2016 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 359 times Debate No: 91801
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (0)

 

David_Debates

Con

I don't know. You tell me, Pro.
Debate Round No. 1
Max.Wallace

Pro

Your argument is incomprehensible. Vote Pro. LOL!
David_Debates

Con

1) Your argument is incomprehensible.
I honestly don't know what this debate is about, and thus, Pro hasn't met his burden.

Could Pro tell us what he is debating about?
Debate Round No. 2
Max.Wallace

Pro

Why did you accept this debate? That's what I am about. You disagreed, and wanted to fight, so here we are. Tell all why I am wrong, INYHO. Do it.
David_Debates

Con

1) Why did you accept this debate?
Because I thought you would make an argument about what your were traumatized by, how you were traumatized by it, and why I, and society, should care. You've failed to do this. All you've done is go in circles about my argument, rather than prove anything.

2) You disagreed, and wanted to fight, so here we are.
I haven't disagreed to anything because you haven't said anything other than "your argument is incomprehensible," and "why are you here." I don't disagree to you saying that.

3) Tell me why I am wrong, INYHO.
Because a) you haven't brought a case forward, b) you haven't proven anything, and c) you have the BoP, and haven't met it.

Vote Con, as Pro hasn't brought a case forward, other than "Your argument is incomprehensible," and "Tell me why I am wrong, INYHO. Do it."
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by David_Debates 1 year ago
David_Debates
I am then unaware of why you state, and I quote: "Lawyers are scum." You misspelled your own words. I inferred you meant scum rather than sum, as the term sum refers to "the total amount resulting from the addition of two or more numbers, amounts, or items."
I hope you don't become an proofreader, Max.
Posted by Max.Wallace 1 year ago
Max.Wallace
You are going to be the dumbest lawyer in history, good luck som.
Posted by Max.Wallace 1 year ago
Max.Wallace
I called you sum. How can you be a lawyer and not even be able to read correctly?
Posted by David_Debates 1 year ago
David_Debates
Agreed. So many debaters, but never enough voters.
Posted by Omniscient_Debater 1 year ago
Omniscient_Debater
It's sad too see many debates these days go without votes.
Posted by David_Debates 1 year ago
David_Debates
I'm sorry you feel that way, but the job of an attorney is necessary to keep public order. I don't see myself as "scum," however.
Posted by Max.Wallace 1 year ago
Max.Wallace
Lawyers are scum, and you are obviously aspiring to be sum. Tell me how wrong I am, if you dare.
No votes have been placed for this debate.