Jesus and Muhammed, the difference.
Debate Rounds (3)
Jesus never wanted to kill people.
Jesus never led an army.
His stupid followers have led many.
Many have been killed in both their names.
There is a difference between these two characters.
How then is it that he didn't order people killed? God flooded the earth, killing the whole population of the world, save Noah and his family. God demanded the extermination of the Canaanites/Amalekites. If Christ is God on Earth, this is the same supreme being who did all of these things, just not in his corporeal human form.
Christ was also in perfect agreement with the father, so how could it be that he was opposed to war? Having one without the other and cherry-picking just the parts of the holy trinity with which a person agrees is inherently flawed.
This means that Christ must be in agreement with other aspects of the trinity in order to remain one entity; if he is not, he is not in agreement with the understanding of what is meant by the holy trinity, and the premise of the faith itself would be flawed were that the case.
If it is understood that Christ follows the "rules" of the faith which names him God, then Christ is the same God who killed myriad persons through war, famine, and general wrath.
If Christ is the son of God, he is not peaceful. He is just the form utilized for God to walk the earth.
Max.Wallace forfeited this round.
AgentCooper forfeited this round.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.