The Instigator
anointed
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
NNEye
Con (against)
Winning
10 Points

Jesus was gay and so was Paul

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
NNEye
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/25/2014 Category: Religion
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 619 times Debate No: 55398
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (6)
Votes (2)

 

anointed

Pro

Mathew 15:24 Jesus was sent to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. These were homosexual tribes and despised by the House of Judah. Jesus was gay, and he was sent to gay people to save them from the sins of Sadducees. The homophobia in the church world is Saddusaic. G-d made 10% of the world gay.
NNEye

Con

Hello.

All instances of homosexuality in the Bible refer to sexual intercourse between people of the same gender, not to feelings of attraction to other people of the same gender.

With that being said, there is no Biblical or extra-Biblical evidence supporting the assertion that Jesus or Paul were homosexual (in the modern sense of the word, i.e. sexually attracted to other men) or in support of homosexuality. On the contrary, the Bible is against homosexuality.

(All from the KJV)

Concerning God's default position on homosexuality
Leviticus 18:22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

Leviticus 20:13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

Concerning what Paul had to say about homosexuality
Romans 1:26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

1 Corinthians 6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
20 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

1 Timothy 1:8 But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully;
9 Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
10
For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;

Jesus said nothing on the matter of homsexuality. However, because he was sinless (2 Corinthians 5:21, Hebrews 4:15, 1 Peter 2:22, 1 John 3:5) and validated the law (Matthew 5:17-18, Luke 16:16-17), it stands to reason that he was not homosexual.

Pro, being on the affirmative, has the burden of proof; pro must prove Jesus and Paul were homosexual (see definitions below). I, being the negative, must refute pro's case. If pro's case stands, Pro wins. If Pro's case fails, Con wins.

Pro has the floor, or rather the space, in round 2.

Definition(s) [1]

Homosexual: adj. Of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual desire toward another of the same sex

[1] http://www.merriam-webster.com...


Debate Round No. 1
anointed

Pro

anointed forfeited this round.
NNEye

Con

Arguments in Con's opening statement extended. Pro's case (or rebuttal) is still due.
Debate Round No. 2
anointed

Pro

anointed forfeited this round.
NNEye

Con

Arguments in Con's opening statement extended. Pro's case (or rebuttal) is officially overdue.
Debate Round No. 3
anointed

Pro

anointed forfeited this round.
NNEye

Con

I give Pro one more chance to say something.
Debate Round No. 4
anointed

Pro

anointed forfeited this round.
NNEye

Con

I would be surprised if this gets any votes.
Debate Round No. 5
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by NNEye 3 years ago
NNEye
Are you going to make an argument in the debate?
Posted by NNEye 3 years ago
NNEye
Post it in the debate
Posted by anointed 3 years ago
anointed
The laws in Leviticus are called the " Holiness Code" because this is a priest document. The current modern understanding of ancient people do not correlate nor can you take modern concepts of an ancient practice to translate into an untranslatable culture unless one takes the time to remove ones set way of thinking to explore the facts. The term "Kedoshim" in Hebrew means "Holy Ones". The Holy Ones were the homosexuals. They were called gods, and they were the "Two people" Anointed ones. Tbe
They were made this way, and their sexual practice was forbidden to "Mankind". The sons of the gods that looked upon the daughterz of men were these people. The Hebrews apiro-the fruit people. They were homosexual and bi-sexual holy people. The Samaritans were a tribe of these homosexuals and this why Jesus was sent to the lost sheep.
Posted by NNEye 3 years ago
NNEye
5 Rounds, each 10,000 characters...
Posted by DSky25 3 years ago
DSky25
Of course Jesus was gay. He had to have had sex with himself to give birth to himself.
Posted by FuzzyCatPotato 3 years ago
FuzzyCatPotato
Some also say that he married Mary. Perhaps bi?
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Ajab 2 years ago
Ajab
anointedNNEyeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: A obviously meant this as a troll debate, also N showed successfully that nor Jesus nor Paul were gay.
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 2 years ago
bladerunner060
anointedNNEyeTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct for the forfeits. Arguments because Con rebutted Pro's case sufficiently, particularly in light of the total lack of response from Pro. I'm sorry that Pro decided to waste Con's time. All other categories were equal enough. As always, happy to clarify this RFD.