The Instigator
Max.Wallace
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
9spaceking
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

Jesus was the devil. Yeah right, only a greedy tyrant could believe that.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
9spaceking
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/27/2014 Category: Science
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 488 times Debate No: 64051
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (2)
Votes (2)

 

Max.Wallace

Pro

The most scientific, powerful and politically correct killed him, so obviously he was, to THEY.
9spaceking

Con

Accepted. Opponent has full BoP to prove that only greedy tyrants (why not just greedy people overall?) believe that Jesus was a devil.
Debate Round No. 1
Max.Wallace

Pro

you are correct, there are a of mother Theresa's of other religions that would argue your point, however their greed is in the nature of their ability to sacrifice themselves for any who take it. I believe that the BOP is yours as you chose to disagree.
9spaceking

Con

Very well. I will prove that not only greedy tyrants think Jesus is the devil.

This youtube video clearly show non-tyrants protesting and complaining about Jesus being the devil.

http://www.foxnews.com...
The above site also proves that non-tyrants complain that Jesus is the devil.
Debate Round No. 2
Max.Wallace

Pro

In my opinion, they believe in their opinion so strongly, as have many Jesus "loving" fools of power, that they are nothing but aspiring tyrants, or wishers of Armageddon where only they will be left to rule the world. No sources here, except my opinion, as usually sources are full of more lies then the fools that believe them, just like holy books.
9spaceking

Con

Tyrant: a sovereign or other ruler who uses power oppressively or unjustly
from: http://dictionary.reference.com...
Lol, nope. They aren't rulers.
I win. VOTE ME.
Debate Round No. 3
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
my opponent completely missed the word "aspiring". Truth be told I didn't watch the video, as it could be any hollwooder playing a role.
Posted by Max.Wallace 2 years ago
Max.Wallace
As they will again.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by NathanDuclos 2 years ago
NathanDuclos
Max.Wallace9spacekingTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Totally believe jesus was evil and horrible and fictional, however Con made his arguments. . .
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
Max.Wallace9spacekingTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Tie. Both had good conduct throughout the debate. S&G - Con. Pro failed to capitalize several times where it was needed (like at the beginning of sentences). Con did not make these errors, hence he wins S&G. Arguments - Con. Con was able to effectively show that there are others who view Jesus as the Devil aside from just greedy tyrants. He did so with empirical evidence. Pro was unable to affirm the resolution after that point. This is why Con wins arguments. Sources - Con. Pro failed to utilize sources in this debate, whereas Con did. This is a clear win for Con.