The Instigator
Hitlerwasagoodguyxd
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
SonicAndRapBattles
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Jews are gay (I put the category as sports cuz Jews running from gunfire is sporty)

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/19/2016 Category: Sports
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 283 times Debate No: 89878
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (5)
Votes (0)

 

Hitlerwasagoodguyxd

Pro

Jews are stinky. Jews are silly. Jews are silly silly. K m8? Now my personal favourite stuffs, a passage from my own 'Mein Kampf' ere: On February 24th, 1920, the first great mass meeting under the auspices of the new movement took place. In the Banquet Hall of the Hofbr"uhaus in Munich the twenty-five theses which constituted the programme of our new party were expounded to an audience of nearly two thousand people and each thesis was enthusiastically received.
Thus we brought to the knowledge of the public those first principles and lines of action along which the new struggle was to be conducted for the abolition of a confused mass of obsolete ideas and opinions which had obscure and often pernicious tendencies. A new force was to make its appearance among the timid and feckless bourgeoisie. This force was destined to impede the triumphant advance of the Marxists and bring the Chariot of Fate to a standstill just as it seemed about to reach its goal.
It was evident that this new movement could gain the public significance and support which are necessary pre-requisites in such a gigantic struggle only if it succeeded from the very outset in awakening a sacrosanct conviction in the hearts of its followers, that here it was not a case of introducing a new electoral slogan into the political field but that an entirely new world view, which was of a radical significance, had to be promoted.
One must try to recall the miserable jumble of opinions that used to be arrayed side by side to form the usual Party Programme, as it was called, and one must remember how these opinions used to be brushed up or dressed in a new form from time to time. If we would properly understand these programmatic monstrosities we must carefully investigate the motives which inspired the average bourgeois 'programme committee'.
Those people are always influenced by one and the same preoccupation when they introduce something new into their programme or modify something already contained in it. That preoccupation is directed towards the results of the next election. The moment these artists in parliamentary government have the first glimmering of a suspicion that their darling public may be ready to kick up its heels and escape from the harness of the old party wagon they begin to paint the shafts with new colours. On such occasions the party astrologists and horoscope readers, the so-called 'experienced men' and 'experts', come forward. For the most part they are old parliamentary hands whose political schooling has furnished them with ample experience. They can remember former occasions when the masses showed signs of losing patience and they now diagnose the menace of a similar situation arising. Resorting to their old prescription, they form a 'committee'. They go around among the darling public and listen to what is being said. They dip their noses into the newspapers and gradually begin to scent what it is that their darlings, the broad masses, are wishing for, what they reject and what they are hoping for. The groups that belong to each trade or business, and even office employees, are carefully studied and their innermost desires are investigated. The 'malicious slogans' of the opposition from which danger is threatened are now suddenly looked upon as worthy of reconsideration, and it often happens that these slogans, to the great astonishment of those who originally coined and circulated them, now appear to be quite harmless and indeed are to be found among the dogmas of the old parties.
So the committees meet to revise the old programme and draw up a new one.
For these people change their convictions just as the soldier changes his shirt in war " when the old one is bug-eaten. In the new programme everyone gets everything he wants. The farmer is assured that the interests of agriculture will be safeguarded. The industrialist is assured of protection for his products. The consumer is assured that his interests will be protected in the market prices. Teachers are given higher salaries and civil servants will have better pensions. Widows and orphans will receive generous assistance from the State. Trade will be promoted. The tariff will be lowered and even the taxes, though they cannot be entirely abolished, will be almost abolished. It sometimes happens that one section of the public is forgotten or that one of the demands mooted among the public has not reached the ears of the party. This is also hurriedly patched on to the whole, should there be any space available for it: until finally it is felt that there are good grounds for hoping that the whole normal host of philistines, including their wives, will have their anxieties laid to rest and will beam with satisfaction once again. And so, internally armed with faith in the goodness of God and the impenetrable stupidity of the electorate, the struggle for what is called 'the reconstruction of the Reich' can now begin.
When the election day is over and the parliamentarians have held their last public meeting for the next five years, when they can leave their job of getting the populace to toe the line and can now devote themselves to higher and more pleasing tasks " then the programme committee is dissolved and the struggle for the progressive reorganization of public affairs becomes once again a business of earning one's daily bread, which for the parliamentarians means merely the attendance that is required in order to be able to draw their daily remunerations. Morning after morning the honourable deputy wends his way to the House, and though he may not enter the Chamber itself he gets at least as far as the front hall, where he will find the register on which the names of the deputies in attendance have to be inscribed. As a part of his onerous service to his constituents he enters his name, and in return receives a small indemnity as a well-earned reward for his unceasing and exhausting labours.
When four years have passed, or in the meantime if there should be some critical weeks during which the parliamentary corporations have to face the danger of being dissolved, these honourable gentlemen become suddenly seized by an irresistible desire to act. Just as the grub-worm cannot help growing into a cock-chafer, these parliamentarian worms leave the great House of Puppets and flutter on new wings out among the beloved public. They address the electors once again, give an account of the enormous labours they have accomplished and emphasize the malicious obstinacy of their opponents. They do not always meet with grateful applause; for occasionally the unintelligent masses throw rude and unfriendly remarks in their faces. When this spirit of public ingratitude reaches a certain pitch there is only one way of saving the situation. The prestige of the party must be burnished up again. The programme has to be amended. The committee is called into existence once again. And the swindle begins anew. Once we understand the impenetrable stupidity of our public we cannot be surprised that such tactics turn out successful. Led by the Press and blinded once again by the alluring appearance of the new programme, the bourgeois as well as the proletarian herds of voters faithfully return to the common stall and re-elect their old deceivers. The 'people's man' and labour candidate now change back again into the parliamentarian grub and become fat and rotund as they batten on the leaves that grow on the tree of public life " to be retransformed into the glittering butterfly after another four years have passed.
Scarcely anything else can be so depressing as to watch this process in sober reality and to be the eyewitness of this repeatedly recurring fraud. On a spiritual training ground of that kind it is not possible for the bourgeois forces to develop the strength which is necessary to carry on the fight against the organized might of Marxism. Indeed they have never seriously thought of doing so. Though these parliamentary quacks who represent the white race are generally recognized as persons of quite inferior mental capacity, they are shrewd enough to know that they could not seriously entertain the hope of being able to use the weapon of Western Democracy to fight a doctrine for the advance of which Western Democracy, with all its accessories, is employed as a means to an end. Democracy is exploited by the Marxists for the purpose of paralysing their opponents and gaining for themselves a free hand to put their own methods into action. When certain groups of Marxists use all their ingenuity for the time being to make it be believed that they are inseparably attached to the principles of democracy, it may be well to recall the fact that when critical occasions arose these same gentlemen snapped their fingers at the principle of decision by majority vote, as that principle is understood by Western Democracy. Such was the case in those days when the bourgeois parliamentarians, in their monumental shortsightedness, believed that the security of the Reich was guaranteed because it had an overwhelming numerical majority in its favour, and the Marxists did not hesitate suddenly to grasp supreme power in their own hands, backed by a mob of loafers, deserters, political place-hunters and Jewish dilettanti. That was a blow in the face for that democracy in which so many parliamentarians believed. Only those credulous parliamentary wizards who represented bourgeois democracy could have believed that the brutal determination of those whose interest it is to spread the Marxist world-pest, of which they are the carriers, could for a moment, now or in the future, be held in check by the magical formulas of Western Parliamentarianism. Marxism will march shoulder to shoulder with democracy until it succeeds indirectly in securing for its own criminal purposes even the support of those whose minds are nationally orientated and whom Marxism strives to exterminate. But if the Marxists should one day Xd.
SonicAndRapBattles

Con

I will argue that people of the Jewish religion are NOT homosexual (although some may be, i am arguing for the WHOLE of Jewish religion/culture).

Myself not being Jewish, i may miss a few little tidbits of info involving Jewish culture, so please forgive me if i make a mistake or 2.

Gay- relating to, or exhibiting sexual desires or behavior directed towards a person or persons of one's own sex(as in gender)
Debate Round No. 1
Hitlerwasagoodguyxd

Pro

Look, bruv, first of all fuc-king hedgehogs don't rap. K? Did you even read Mein Kampf? Is gud book. Get audible version nice stuffs. Anyways m8 I am not a rat. I prefer to call myself an attack helicopter, as I sexually identify as one. And have you even visited a Jewish community? Because during wwII the stuff they were doing in my concentration camps was pretty bad bruv. I tried to give them a prison economy based off which Jew has the biggest nose. The ones with the smallest acted like currency as they paraded around the Jews with the bigger noses. The Jews with the bigger noses would use them as prison bitches like in Murica. K bruv?
SonicAndRapBattles

Con

SonicAndRapBattles forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Hitlerwasagoodguyxd

Pro

Hitlerwasagoodguyxd forfeited this round.
SonicAndRapBattles

Con

SonicAndRapBattles forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Hitlerwasagoodguyxd

Pro

Hitlerwasagoodguyxd forfeited this round.
SonicAndRapBattles

Con

Please forgive me for my absence (Spring Break was a very busy week for me).

the idealogy surrounding that debate is so repulsive i almost shot myself looking at it. 1st of all, its Sonic AND RapBattles, not SonicRapBattles. 2nd of all, you made no argument stating how the jewish culture is 'gay' and instead stated 'facts' about your sexual properties. 3rd, You offended many people by mentioning the 'economy' around the size of jewish people's noses.

As you can see, this debater had very little/no evidence to support his claim. Vote Con
Debate Round No. 4
Hitlerwasagoodguyxd

Pro

Hitlerwasagoodguyxd forfeited this round.
SonicAndRapBattles

Con

SonicAndRapBattles forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by kennykenkenken 1 year ago
kennykenkenken
Racist SOB
Posted by SonicAndRapBattles 1 year ago
SonicAndRapBattles
you fascist rat
Posted by missbailey8 1 year ago
missbailey8
I kinda want to accept this and play it as seriously as possible...
Posted by MagicAintReal 1 year ago
MagicAintReal
This is 5 rounds long?
Jeez.
Posted by iamfromdebatewars 1 year ago
iamfromdebatewars
Are you proudamerican888? . I mean i knew him.
No votes have been placed for this debate.