John Lennon's song "Imagine" reflects a bleak existence rather than a socialist utopia.
Vote Here
The voting period for this debate does not end.
| Started: | 2/27/2009 | Category: | Arts |
| Updated: | 8 months ago | Status: | Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 1,515 times | Debate No: | 7142 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (9)
Votes (8)
|
In the lyrics of his song Lennon asks the listener to imagine a world with "nothing to kill or die for". It is my contention that an existence in which there is nothing we value enough to give our life for or for which we are willing to take the life of another who wishes to deprive us of that which we value is ultimately an unfulfilled life.
So my position in this round is that the song "Imagine" represents a Utopian society. You may say that I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you'll join us And the world will live as one This plainly says that Lennon is trying to establish a perfect Utopian dream. The line "You may say that I'm a dreamer" represents this perfectly as what it establishes is that Lennon thinks that people will think his ideas to idealistic or to perfect, thus a Utopia. As for my opponents point the problem is, is that Lennon portrays not bleak existence but an existence without war. With "nothing to kill or die for" there will be no war, no conflict. Thus utopia |
![]() |
|
I would like to thank my opponent for taking on the debate, this should be interesting.
An existence without war is not necessarily an existence with out things for which we would be willing to die for. If all of the worlds citizens agreed on what was to be valued then war might not be a potential however the problem that is presented with Lennon's dream is that in it their exist nothing for which individuals would consider defending with even the slightest protest. It's accentually the apathetic versus the passionate. A world in which no debate or protest exists and everyone has conformed to one set of values and ideals. In such a world no individual would be compelled to sacrifice the time required to accomplish a dream. Contrast this with a world in which individuals feel passionate about their beliefs. Those passions are what inspire progress and conflict. So all of this to say; A life lived in apathy is no utopia but rather hell.
"In such a world no individual would be compelled to sacrifice the time required to accomplish a dream. Contrast this with a world in which individuals feel passionate about their beliefs." Lennon's point is that the world is Utopian, however impossible to achieve, what he is describing is a world in which nobody has anything to die for because things which people usually die for are gone, achieved. lets look at the rest of the line in the song to put it in context. Imagine there's no countries It isn't hard to do Nothing to kill or die for And no religion too Imagine all the people Living life in peace What Lennon does with Imagine is set up an idea for a Utopian society, where we will need nothing to kill or die for. Whenever people want something really badly, some people will be willing to die for it. So what this means is that the wishes of the people have been fulfilled if there is nothing to "kill of die for" Furthermore The song does not specifically refer to individuals. If you look at the context you will find Lennon is talking about wars, not beliefs. When countries live in peace with each other nobody has to kill or die for their country. Without religion nobody has to kill or die for their religion. Thus Lennon's message in this section is actually that of peace. Extend my other arguments from last round which were: You may say that I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you'll join us And the world will live as one This plainly says that Lennon is trying to establish a perfect Utopian dream. The line "You may say that I'm a dreamer" represents this perfectly as what it establishes is that Lennon thinks that people will think his ideas to idealistic or to perfect, thus a Utopia. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Full Song for all reading this debate: Something you should know about Imagine Lyrics Title: John Lennon - Imagine lyrics Artist: John Lennon Lyrics Visitors: 559212 visitors have hited Imagine Lyrics since May 27, 2008. i Send "Imagine" Ringtone to Mobile Imagine there's no Heaven It's easy if you try No hell below us Above us only sky Imagine all the people Living for today Imagine there's no countries It isn't hard to do Nothing to kill or die for And no religion too Imagine all the people Living life in peace You may say that I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you'll join us And the world will be as one Imagine no possessions I wonder if you can No need for greed or hunger A brotherhood of man Imagine all the people Sharing all the world You may say that I'm a dreamer But I'm not the only one I hope someday you'll join us And the world will live as one (http://www.lyrics007.com...) |
![]() |
|
The line "Nothing to kill or die for" is very clear and specific. He could have just as easily said "No reason to kill or to die" which would have had a completely different meaning.
I understand that John Lennon fully believed that his song represented a utopia but it is my contention that it was not a well thought out utopia and that is the ultimate flaw in his vision. Man must struggle against nature, himself and his challengers in order to truly enjoy his successes. It is the contrast that life offers that gives us our awareness of the joys and pleasures of our existence. John Lennon was a brilliant entertainer however he was vulnerable, as many have been, to great but flawed ideas for society. I've enjoyed this debate and I thank my opponent for his worthy challenge.
My Opponent Neglects to Put that Line into Context. he says that "Nothing to kill or die for" is very different that "No reason to kill or to die" which taken out of context it is. But If you look at its placement in the song you will find that "Imagine there's no countries It isn't hard to do Nothing to kill or die for And no religion too Makes the line "Nothing to kill or die for" the same as ""No reason to kill or to die." Lennon is that line is referring to his vision that national borders and religion ought to be abolished so that people will have "nothing to kill or die for" My Opponent Further contends "Man must struggle against nature, himself and his challengers in order to truly enjoy his successes. It is the contrast that life offers that gives us our awareness of the joys and pleasures of our existence." While I fully agree this does not actually have anything to do with Lennon's song. It never says in the song that people would not disagree, but that they would not be willing to kill or be killed because of their religious or territorial boundaries. That is all that is reflected in that section of the song and the only part contested by my opponent as a bleak existence. So what my opponents point has become is that killing and death is good and to abolish them would create a bleak existence. What he proposes is rather dystopian, so we have to see that Imagine actually reflects a Utopian Existence. |
![]() |
Loading voting charts...
Show people this debate by sending them this public link:










Posted by Bhas 2 weeks ago
do you really believe that socialism is moral and superior?
I do believe socialism to be more moral and in many ways superior to capitalism. While I understand it has its faults, as does everything, I believe that as humans we have a moral obligation to other humans. We need to help them out, everyone deserves the same basic treatment. I.e Healthcare, food, housing. We all want it so why should we deny it to some of us because they can't make enough money. Poverty perpetuates poverty. Is the right to live really exclusive to the 'upper' classes? So my solution, is socialism that is, fairness. True Communistic equality is impractical but the rough equality of a socialist government is achievable and is the most morally superior system. Capitalism just allows a few to control what goes on, and it ends up leaving behind everyone that doesn't have the money to make some large firm more profit.
Sources: Tie.
Conduct: Tie.
Grammar and Eloquence: Pro
It's easy if you try"
idk!