Judaism (Pro) vs. Islam Con:
Debate Rounds (5)
Harry Truman, Yavneh, Capahab, and Talmid.
Chose 3+ team mates and compose your argument for Islam and opposing Judaism.
My team is comprised of me, myself, and I. A little bit about myself: I am a student of Comparative Religions and I have been so for the last 4 years. I have had many fruitful conversations with people of different backgrounds and Religious affiliations, which has taught me many great things.
I will be taking the side of Con, which is according to the instigators, the side that represents Islam. This round will be only for acceptance given that the instigators have not provided any opening arguments for me to respond to. Please note that, just because I have taken this side, it does NOT mean that I look down upon Judaism nor do I view Islam as a superior belief than Judaism. If the instigators would have taken Pro to be Islam, I would have glady taken Con as Judaism. The titles of these Religions are both Divine in origin, where a Message was shared to our human family by God through His Messengers, Moses and Muhammad, respectively.
I pray we have a great debate, whatever this debate may be on, and I hope we can all learn from each other as brothers exploring the Messages of God.
God Bless ;)
But first, I will ask our opponent to get himself 2 other members, otherwise it isn't a team debate, if you are having a hard time getting people, here are a few suggestions:
Please chose 2 of these for this debate to continue, if we wanted a one-on-one debate we would have chosen one, not to be rude.
now without further adue, here is our document:
I am absolutely dicusted by your arguments in your argument, Lot being a prophet, beating your wife being OK, Native Americans being savages, etc., then you ask us to "be respectfull," stop the absurdities please.
Here is the argument...Hope you guys like it haha :)
y'all are champs!
persianimmortal forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by SirMaximus 10 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||1||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Con forfeited 1 round, and Pro forfeited no rounds. Therefore, Pro wins for conduct.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.