The Instigator
swagasaurus
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
MacGruber
Con (against)
Winning
4 Points

Just how much wood could a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
MacGruber
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/7/2012 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 783 times Debate No: 27944
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (5)
Votes (1)

 

swagasaurus

Pro

Hey there, I am new here and would just like to get my feet wet with a silly, fun debate! As I see it, there are two possible ways that this debate could go.
1. Someone debates me who is nice, silly, and doesn't take this too seriously.
2. Someone debates me who would be absolutely brutal, merciless, and crushes me into tiny bits and pieces. Taking this debate incredibly seriously, they would destroy my ego with crazy rhetoric skills and facts. They would also insult me and call me mean names while spitting on my mother's grave.
Honestly, I could go for either but option #2 would be hilarious for me to look back upon.
My stance is that a woodchuck could chuck a finite amount of wood in it's lifetime. This number I would estimate to be about 2 million pounds if there was a constant rate.
There are no rules for this debate. Please, use whatever form of twisted logic, syllogisms, or sources you might use. Yahoo answers, encyclopedias, www.shrekchan.org, whatever just go for it.
MacGruber

Con

I accept. I would like to start by saying that we must first choose what species we are talking about, what "chucking" is, and how much wood is available to said rodent.
Debate Round No. 1
swagasaurus

Pro

swagasaurus forfeited this round.
MacGruber

Con

MacGruber forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
swagasaurus

Pro

swagasaurus forfeited this round.
MacGruber

Con

It seems that Pro has forfeited all current rounds, and has essentially conceded trying to prove the determinable amount of how much wood could a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood. As it is, he mst lose points for conduct. CON!
Debate Round No. 3
swagasaurus

Pro

swagasaurus forfeited this round.
MacGruber

Con

I suppose we'll never know how much wood could a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood. Vote CON!
Debate Round No. 4
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by MacGruber 4 years ago
MacGruber
I think he gave up...
Posted by Derpy 4 years ago
Derpy
WTF!?!?!?! I dont understand
Posted by Derpy 4 years ago
Derpy
WTF!?!?!?! I dont understand
Posted by Cometflash 4 years ago
Cometflash
By the way he wrote his initial post, it looks like you could argue whatever you want, and creativity, or creative sources, would be what dictates who wins.
Posted by phantom 4 years ago
phantom
So I'd have to argue one could chuck and infinite amount?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Magicr 4 years ago
Magicr
swagasaurusMacGruberTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct: Pro forfeited more. Con gets arguments as since the BoP was not stated to be shared, it is assumed to be on Pro, who made no convincing arguments to affirm the resolution.