The Instigator
9spaceking
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
YYW
Con (against)
Winning
6 Points

Justin Bieber Should be Given the Death Penalty

Do you like this debate?NoYes+3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
YYW
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/15/2014 Category: Funny
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 4,790 times Debate No: 60484
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (22)
Votes (2)

 

9spaceking

Pro

48 hours to argue, 4,000 character limit, and 4 rounds.
Round one is for acceptance only.
Good luck and have fun.
YYW

Con

I accept. This should be amusing.
Debate Round No. 1
9spaceking

Pro

http://imgflip.com...
Well, I suppose I shouldn't have left this JB debate open to possibilities, especially since YYW loves topics about JB.


Anyhow, reasons why JB should be given Death Penalty:
1. He does what he wants and ain't stopping
He assaulted a limosine driver himself. [1] He was supposed to go to an Anger management class yet he didn't go. [2] Bieber even acts like a little baby and eggs another woman for seemingly no reason. [3] Seriously, dude? I mean, the damages seem to be worth $20,000!! That's a lot. Imagine what damage JB could do to other houses with eggs and manage to get away with everything. JB also has done 16 shocking incidents that even further prove how cruel, malicious and evil intent this man has. [7] He also smokes marijuana and consumes prescription medication, and was found to be on drugs when he was driving. [4] Think about it! It's lucky we stopped him in time. If JB had succeeded in even going a bit further, who knows what would have happened? He could have killed a load of people with that car. He's a murder in progress! Stop him before he continues!

2. Everybody hates him
Why should we keep a person that we hate? In fact, why should we keep a person that everybody hates? JB is more well known with his haters rather than his fans. [5] One good example is his most infamous video, Baby, the video which is presented above. He has twice as many haters as fans, based on the dislike: like ratio. Simply deporting him is not enough though, he is world famous. [6] Well, not most famous in the world, but you know what I mean. Thus we must kill him for the better good of man-kind. Plus, people would probably want to kill him anyways. If the ratio was expanded to the world population, then it would be about 2 billion to 4 billion. (If we supposed 1 billion people had no knowledge of him, which is very possible indeed) In fact, the odds are turning against Justin. Even his good old fans are turning into his haters. [8] In addition, people already want to kill him. [11] Thus, we can conclude we must rid of this terrible being, the only way to do that is...helping those assassins and give JB the death penalty.

3. He can't get into Life Sentence for life.
JB has already managed to get out of going to jail once. [9] Nothing suggests that he won't be able to avoid life sentence. In addition, with so much fans out there, even though we can stop the protests, we can't stop the people that might get him out and corrupt him to become worse than he already is and hate the government and not just be arrogant and spit on his fans. Although life sentence may be cheaper, it's not manageable and JB can continually kill people. Wait-- did I just say that Justin killed people? Yeah, that's right.

4. The death penalty is just
Now, speaking morality, you're probably like "no way did JB kill anybody. He's bad, he should be deported, but that does not mean he should die". But you are incorrect. JB ran over some poor photographer, killing him. [10] This is further supported by source [12] and [13]. We can then logically conclude that this is not some lame hoax but rather true news. Justin Bieber must be killed via death penalty. He is not only a terrible person who ruin lies of others, but himself as well. Deporting him is not option. Keeping him is no option. The only way out is the Death Penaltay!

Onto you, YYW.

[1] http://v.gd...
[2] http://v.gd...
[3] http://v.gd...
[4] http://v.gd...
[5] http://v.gd...
[6] http://v.gd...
[7] http://v.gd...
[8] http://v.gd...
[9] http://v.gd...
[10] http://v.gd...
[11] http://www.cnn.com...
[12] http://v.gd...
[13] http://v.gd...
YYW

Con

As PRO has pointed out, I love topics about Justin Bieber. I used to be a fan, before he got all tattooed and became a giant douche. But, now he's a giant douche who drinks and drives and generally acts like a thug. But, that doesn't mean that JB deserves to be executed. Before getting to my arguments, I want to observe that the death penalty is a punishment -and one of the most severe kind. We don't even execute all murderers, unless you count Texas.

The Basic Argument: The Biebz has done all kinds of horrible stuff, but he doesn't deserve to be executed.

JB has inflicted his horrible music on us, and apparently has no intention of stopping. This is awful, and I don't contest that a thorough round of public shaming and humiliation is in order -especially for what he said about Bill Clinton. Perhaps he should be caned in Times Square, or tarred and feathered... but execution is way too harsh. Execution is capital punishment, and we only subject those criminals to it which have committed capital crimes. (1) Being a giant arrogant douche, getting a DUI and having ugly-@ss tattoos are not capital crimes. Biebz has not committed capital crimes of any kind, so we can't execute him.

Rebutting PRO's case:

PRO's first argument is that JB "does what he wants and a'int stopping." It is not in dispute that JB assaulted a limo driver, failed to attend anger management classes, egged a woman's house, has abused drugs and has driven under the influence of drugs and alcohol. Since we're on the subject of medieval punishments, maybe he needs to be publicly caned on his little Bieber buns to whack some sense into him, or better yet perhaps he should be locked in the stockade for people to throw eggs at him... but execution is too harsh. I reiterate, JB has done nothing to warrant capital punishment.

PRO's second argument is that everybody hates the Biebz, so he should just be killed. If this were Iran, then perhaps I could understand that line of reasoning. Iran has a noted history of killing off people it doesn't like, even young guys whose lives have not even yet really begun. (1) But, we're better than them. Killing JB makes the United States like Iran, and that's simply unacceptable. We only kill people who kill other people, unless you count Texas, which is really just interested in killing people that their noted "finders of fact" find to probably have killed people -especially if the person Texas is thinking about killing is black or latino.

PRO's third argument is that JB can't only get a life sentence because he might get out, and for some other reasons that aren't really relevant. It's clear that PRO doesn't like JB, but PRO wants to make the US legal system like Iran's to retaliate -and that's just not cool. We don't lock people up for life for the things JB has done, because that would make us like Iran -or Russia, which also has a noted history of imprisoning people it doesn't like. But, that's irrelevant because we're not talking about life in prison. We're talking about the state killing the Biebz, which is totally unjustified.

PRO's fourth argument is irrelevant because the death penalty's being just or not has no bearing on whether JB should be subject to it. The only question you have to ask yourself as a judge is this: "Has Justin Beiber committed a capital crime?" If the answer is no, vote for YYW, yo.

Sources:

http://en.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 2
9spaceking

Pro

COUNTER-REBUTTALS
My opponent's argument heavily depends on whether or not he commited capital crime.
My 2cd argument: exactly, let's execute him in Iran or Texas.
My 3rd argument: Again, put him in Iran then kill him.
4th argument: yeah, yeah, I know, I'm getting to that.

So, as can seen above, YYW heavily depends on whether or not JB commited a capital crime. Well, he certainly did. He killed that photographer with his car. He also attempted to assassinate the president in a secret plot (see video source for evil plot forming) He is considered one of the most evil people in the world[1], and even if he didn't succeed in his attempt, he was still hated by the president...The president is so darn angry he even created a meme about it


And Bieber even wanted to kill his love, Selena Gomez. [2] In fact, Obama hated JB so much, he narrowly deported Justin Bieber just because of his personal feelings, had it not been his presidential duty to try to be as unbiased as possible. On a side note, President Bill Clinton that was insulted (but Bill has no power to give JB the death penalty). [3]

Again, I repeat, people want to kill Justin Bieber. Why not do it for them, except ignore the part about castration? (Because the addition of such torture may be over-the-board). Justin will get less pain than he would from the torturers but still get what people want--remember, we have majority rules! (To stress this again, even in a poll about his deportation, the majority want him deported [4])

However, deportation would do nothing. He would egg Chinese houses. He would kill Canadian photographers. He would still recklessly drive around and obtain African drugs and spit on his fans. The only solution still remains...THE DEATH PENATLY.

Back to you, con.


[1] http://www.thetoptens.com...
[2] http://hollywoodlife.com...
[3] http://hollywoodlife.com...
[4] http://hollywoodlife.com...
YYW

Con

This is... interesting.

PRO doesn't really rebut my arguments... he just sort of acknowledges that they're there, and then moves on to other stuff. The fact remains that Bibez didn't murder a reporter with his car. I'm sorry, PRO, but the only thing Justin Bieber has murdered is pop music after his latest album -and that is not a capital crime. (1) PRO's conspiracy theory is interesting, though.

PRO claims that the Biebz is part of some assassination plot -but the only evidence is that JB is teeny-bop-pop's Manchurian candidate. We find support for this claim in the fact in his song when he looked like a young and sexually androgynous figure in "Baby" that later grew into this: http://static0.nydailynews.com....

Warning. Explicit content.

And being a thug with a gross wanna-be mustache (seen here: http://images6.fanpop.com...) doesn't make him one of the most evil people in the world. It just makes him the gross and ugly paragon of what it means to be white trash which happened to come into entirely too much money at entirely too young of an age. The truth is that we should be taking pity on JB... that is, after locking him in the stockades and caning his Bieber buns for being a giant douche.

Finally, I'll just make a simple note of this in passing... Obama does not hate JB. Here's a picture of the president of the United States shaking hands with that terribly truculent twink: http://images.intouchweekly.com.... Justin Beiber also sang at the White House. See video.

It may be that some people (like my opponent) want to kill JB, just as Iran wants to kill homosexuals and Texas wants to kill all the black people and latinos that their racist cops arrest, but that's just not acceptable. The death penalty is not an acceptable consequence for JB's social faux pauses. Locking him in the stockades, and subjecting him to some hard core S&M style public humiliation might, however...

That is why I submit to you, the judge, my counter plan:

Lock JB in the stockades and allow the American public to paddle his Bieber buns as retaliation for all the unpleasantness he has inflicted on us since visiting his Bieberishness on the lower 48. I don't question that the people need revenge, so let's give it to them! At least we'll still be better (and kinkier) than Iran and Texas.

(1) http://en.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 3
9spaceking

Pro

FINAL ROUND
I'm aware that I only acknowledged that your arguments were there, the important argument of yours hinges on whether or not Justin Bieber did the capital crime.

My opponent does not really make any suggestion that JB is in fact NOT part of an assassination plot, so my argument still stands. As for Obama not hating JB, I have a video that suggests otherwise.

In addition, Obama doesn't even have a single JB song on his iPad. [1] Thus it can be concluded he is definitely not a fan and at the very least does not like Justin.

Locking JB in the stockades and allowing the public to paddle his Bieber buns: the biggest problem is those people who go too far. Do we really want to allow him to get castrated? Well, we stopped the murder plot, so this much is obvious--we don't want him castrated. The people might beat him up to death anyways in YYW's counter-plan, fulfilling my punishment of the death penalty. Moreover, there still remains the problem of the fans JB has. They'll probably revolt against the public and attempt to stop them, as well as talking about their minority rights. Although the majority rules, I think that if we put him in a more secretive area and only allowed haters inside, then JB will definitely be tortured enough and we will allow him to get the death penalty via the people who hate JB.

IN CONCLUSION
-Obama Hates Justin along with the majority of the public
-JB deserves all his hate and punishment
-The people will kill him in YYW's counter-plan anyways, fulfilling my punishment of the death penalty

This was an interesting debate.
Vote me.
[1] http://www.justinbieberzone.com...
YYW

Con

Many thanks to PRO and all judges. Let's finish this.

PRO's got not evidence that JB was involved in an assassination plot of any kind, so that argument falls. That the president doesn't have a single JB song on his iPod isn't surprising. I'm pretty sure that the president's not gay or a 14 year old girl, but I'm still a little confused why PRO even brought that up. Should we execute all musicians Obama doesn't listen to? What a ridiculous standard.

Above, I suggested that we lock JB in the stockades and allow people to paddle his Bieber buns for all the unpleasantness JB's inflicted on us all. PRO thinks people might take it too far -which I find a little ironic. PRO wants to execute JB, but now he's afraid that people might get a little too spank-happy? Even still, there's a simple solution. Install a few muscular S&M leather daddies to supervise the general public's Bieber butt beating. That just doesn't make sense. I'm not sure why castration came up either. Aside from being gross, that's beyond the scope of the resolution -meaning that it's not a reason why JB should be executed.

Like I said above and which PRO has made really no attempt to rebut, we only execute capital criminals. PRO's mention of shipping JB to Iran or Texas doesn't matter, because we're not Iran or Texas. We're the United freaking States of America. JB's not a capital criminal, so we can't execute him and therefore I've won this debate. However, I acknowledge the public's need for revenge and I've suggested a counter plan to make that happen. I have a theory that the public Bieber paddling will be more satisfying to the public as well, because it allows them to add their own personal touch. I've responded to my opponent's concerns about the risks involved and I've summarily come up with a way better idea to assuage the general public's need to get back at the Biebz.

Vote CON.
Debate Round No. 4
22 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by chloesmithmcleon05 7 months ago
chloesmithmcleon05
this is so messed up you cant put someone to death because you don't like them
Posted by chloesmithmcleon05 7 months ago
chloesmithmcleon05
this is so messed up you cant put someone to death because you don't like them
Posted by SPENCERJOYAGE14 2 years ago
SPENCERJOYAGE14
For the record I'm not a Belieber or a fan of Justin Beiber, but, he does have some pretty awesome ink.
Posted by ESocialBookworm 2 years ago
ESocialBookworm
LINK ME TO THIS WHEN IT'S IN THE VOTING PERIOD nac
Posted by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
The good thing about half-troll is that you can always pull out troll arguments to rebut against serious arguments
Posted by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
this is a half-troll debate, don't take it so seriously
Posted by dirtygabbchez666 2 years ago
dirtygabbchez666
This debate is retarded..trivial....mediocre....and based off a system that doesn't exist.....who in the united states has ever gotten the death penalty over petty offenses?
Posted by dirtygabbchez666 2 years ago
dirtygabbchez666
WTF!!!!???!!!?!?! Death penalty for throwing eggs...vandalism also known as graffitti.....dui.....and getting into it with a limo driver. "the F word!!!!"If that is the case then I would of gotten the death penalty...resurrected just to be given the death penalty about 100 x. My sister got caught vandalizing a house she was 18 and was with a few 17 year olds they filmed it too and all she got was a $300 fine and community service. Justin got fined 80k......that is such bullfecalmatter what kind of piece of fecal matter demands 80k in restitution over eggs?
Posted by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
interesting points.
Posted by blackkid 2 years ago
blackkid
"Beiber buns."

I know who I am voting for.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by thett3 2 years ago
thett3
9spacekingYYWTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: What can I say? On both an argumentative and a sexual level, there's little I can see more appealing than spanking his little bieber buns. I simply have to vote Con for that kind of opportunity
Vote Placed by bsh1 2 years ago
bsh1
9spacekingYYWTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: LMFAO...this round was just...too much. Thank you both for a HIGHLY entertaining debate. Between the kinky counterplan and the out-there arguments Pro gave, I found it hard to stop laughing. I did indeed get a kick out of this debate...(Please promise me though that the term "Bieber Buns" will never be used again, lol.) Okay...*pulls myself together* This is a very clear Con ballots as Pro failed to provide sufficient cause for giving Biebz the DP. He has not yet committed a capitol crime, and being disliked by Obama is not an adequate reason to execute someone. Arguments go Con. Hilarious debate...!