K&M is better than controllers
Debate Rounds (3)
Now, let's go back to my argument which is actually tackling the focus of the debate; a keyboard and mouse setup gives you much more control during FPS gameplay than a controller does. You haven't tried to dispute that.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by distraff 3 months ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Unfortunately "better" wasn't properly defined. Con admitted Pro's argument that k&m are more precise and better. Con argued that really expensive mice are better making it about hardware rather than skill while consoles are the same. Pro argued that different mice are actually not much different especially in higher levels, but this was more of an example rather than a real proof and Con didn't have a chance to respond. So k&m wins on advantage and console wins on fairness. When someone asks what is better for first person shooters I usually think of what is better for me to use to play the game to win, rather than what is better for me to use to fair to other people. But it could be interpreted to mean what is better for the games as a whole and fairness is good for games. So I can't give the win to anyone.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.