The Instigator
theantianarchy
Pro (for)
Losing
65 Points
The Contender
Danielle
Con (against)
Winning
75 Points

Khan needs to be kicked off of this Website

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 3/14/2008 Category: Education
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 3,106 times Debate No: 3254
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (6)
Votes (40)

 

theantianarchy

Pro

To put it simply, Khan is an idiot. He is not contributing to anyone and is probably sitting at his house right now, typing "I am an Idiot" several thousand times on Microsoft word. Please somebody take this moron off of this site.
Danielle

Con

In your argument, you provided 3 reasons why you feel that Khan "needs" to be kicked off of this website and they are as follows:

1) He is an idiot (opinion)
2) He doesn't "contribute to anyone" (irrelevant)
3) He is probably typing "I am an idiot" repeatedly at home (assumption)

I can elaborate, however, for the sake of brevity I will instead list some of my opposing arguments for you to respond to since this is only a 2 round debate.

Here we go!

First, the use of the word "needs" in this topic of debate is pretty extreme. This website does have certain needs, i.e. techies to maintain the database, members to participate and ensure the duration of this site, etc. However kicking one member off is not a "need" -- the site will continue running smoothly whether or not he is indeed kicked off or not.

Second - and more importantly - even if it was deemed a "need" for Khan to be kicked off of this website, it would be completely unnecessary as he is no longer a member of this site anyway. I did a profile search for Khan and no member showed up, thus we can assume that his account no longer exists and therefore there is nothing or no one to kick off. Argument done!

However if I may I would like to continue with some other points just to keep this debate interesting ;)

Okay, since you deemed Khan to be an "idiot" I am assuming that you don't agree with his style of debating, topics of debate, or contribution to this site in terms of the things that he posts. However, if it is a mass opinion that Khan's debating tactics are incoherent, irrelevant or pointless, then everyone still has the option to consistently vote for his opponent. Furthermore, if Khan starts ridiculous debates, people can choose not to argu with him and instead ignore his challenges. If he accepts the challenges of others just to make a mockery of himself, like I said - simply vote for his opponent and ignore his immature and unnecessary remarks.
Debate Round No. 1
theantianarchy

Pro

to tell the truth I started this debate so Khan or Kahn or whatever would stop annoying me. His incessent rudeness and idiocy is mind boggling. Since he is gone. I seem to have achieved my goal, and i really don't care if I win or lose this debate. Sorry for taking your time theLwerd.
Danielle

Con

HaHa - no worries. I don't think I've ever debated Khan or even seen any of his debates. I'm sure he is just as annoying as you say he is; however, there is no need for him to be kicked off this website... he's gone! Yaaay.
Debate Round No. 2
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by theantianarchy 9 years ago
theantianarchy
Thank you theLwerd. I'll send you something to make you laugh posthaste.
Posted by Higgins 9 years ago
Higgins
How is this debate even close- Pro provided little argument at best and was clearly pwned by Lwerd even if the Pro stance is favored by most lol
Posted by Danielle 9 years ago
Danielle
It's no problem, but they don't allow e-mail addresses to be placed in comments... hmm... so in that case, I'll say it like this: my username (theLwerd) at hotmail.com

:)
Posted by JasonMc 9 years ago
JasonMc
I wonder if Kahn isn't a rouge account created by another debater in order to have multiple votes on any given debate, and to annoy whomever he / she chooses. Granted, he / she may just be some 15 year old sitting at his house right now, typing "I am an Idiot" several thousand times on Microsoft word (lol), but it would be very easy for someone to have multiple accounts. Should debate.org allow multiple accounts from the same IP address as long as voting rights were disabled for all but one account?
Posted by theantianarchy 9 years ago
theantianarchy
PS theLwerd, could I get your email? your arguments are awesome. and I have some cool things I think you will like. Not in a creepy way. Sorry if it comes across like that, but I would like to know you better. You don't have to give it to me, but whatever.
Posted by Danielle 9 years ago
Danielle
Ps. Even if I got the username wrong (and it's not Kahn) my other arguments still stand... hmm...
40 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by NiamC 3 years ago
NiamC
theantianarchyDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:23 
Reasons for voting decision: Khan being kicked surely creates a win for pro, but con had better arguments tho
Vote Placed by KacieMeredith 7 years ago
KacieMeredith
theantianarchyDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by Vi_Veri 8 years ago
Vi_Veri
theantianarchyDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by SaintNick 8 years ago
SaintNick
theantianarchyDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by numa 8 years ago
numa
theantianarchyDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by JBlake 8 years ago
JBlake
theantianarchyDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Jamic 9 years ago
Jamic
theantianarchyDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by DorothyDorothy 9 years ago
DorothyDorothy
theantianarchyDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by HungryAssassin 9 years ago
HungryAssassin
theantianarchyDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by GleefulJoker 9 years ago
GleefulJoker
theantianarchyDanielleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30