The Instigator
king45617
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
CommunistDog
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points

Kids should not play on the internet for more than 5 hours.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
CommunistDog
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/19/2015 Category: Games
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 515 times Debate No: 75544
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (1)

 

king45617

Con

I think we should not let any kids play on the internet for more than 5 hours because it is not healthy for the kids. The screen on the computer or iPad or whatever electronic they have makes the eyes bad and maybe even addicted to the electronic. people should agree with me because it is not healthy from research. To much electronics can be bad for you. A lot of people needed to get glasses or even got bad vision from electronics. It is not healthy for a kid to have this much electronic times.
CommunistDog

Pro

I believe con has mixed his argument with pro. I am supporting the text of the title, "Kids should not play on the internet for more than 5 hours."

Playing on the internet is extremely dangerous if one plays for a long period of time. They are more likely to stumble upon inappropriate or violent content. Additionally, it is harmful physically for a person. It takes a toll on one's eyes and makes one more setentary, thus, the person is inactive and needs more exercise.
Debate Round No. 1
king45617

Con

king45617 forfeited this round.
CommunistDog

Pro

The three reasons I have in mind as to why it should not be allowed are:


  1. Physically unhealthy, leading to weight problems and oftentimes, difficulty with coordination of one's hand(s)/arm(s)

  2. Increases the chances of finding inappropriate content

  3. Can damage eyesight severely

Debate Round No. 2
king45617

Con

king45617 forfeited this round.
CommunistDog

Pro

CommunistDog forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by CommunistDog 2 years ago
CommunistDog
Thank you for the tip, Shapeless.
Posted by ShapelessHorr0r 2 years ago
ShapelessHorr0r
A good topic ruined...

Instigator:
Have some darn evidence. Most of your text means literally nothing.

Other debater:
Read your side before your start the debate.
Posted by jprice19 2 years ago
jprice19
As you are con, you must argue that they should be able to play on the internet for more than 5 hours. Please read your own topic.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by CookieMonster9 2 years ago
CookieMonster9
king45617CommunistDogTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro gets conduct points because even though both forfeited Pro only did it once while Con did it twice. Pro gets argument points because Con was arguing for the wrong side in round 1 and then forfeited the rest of the rounds.