The Instigator
Pro (for)
3 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

Kill the porkypines save the cows

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/16/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 452 times Debate No: 67155
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (5)
Votes (1)




The cows are doing nothing. Yet then they are becoming an endangered species, as everyone are killing them. The thing is, porkypines are killing over one hundred people per day due to mishandling, miscontact and purposeful attack. So then, would it not only be natural to kill the porkypines and use them for meat? Porkypines are not endangered, nor will they; and therefore we should kill the porkypines, filet them and use them to replace beef or any form of that.


I will except this thrilling argument of thrills as we talk about a very sensitive subject about those cute cows being slaughtered because MOAR FOOD.
Debate Round No. 1
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by downwithdooshes 2 years ago
No, I do not mean porcupines I mean porkypines. They suck.
Posted by Seanburns 2 years ago
I can't tell if either of you are taking this seriously. I would love to say I agree with the opposition but the argument he/she uses is an simplistic thought that required little to no thought. Also the proposition misspelled porcupine. It is not spelled "porkypines" it is spelled porcupine which proves he doesn't care enough about this debate to look up how to spell porcupine correctly, or he's dumb enough not to notice, or he's lazy enough not to care. Three thrilling alternatives about the proposition. As for the opposition, more is not spelled "MOAR" While you obviously know this, it reflects poorly on you as for why you choose to use it. Seriously, between the two of you there are two brain cells working against each other and its embarrassing.
Posted by SlovakiaKentros 2 years ago
Wait, one round? Meh, whatever. MY ARGUMENT WAS SOLID LIKE WOOD.
Posted by peacenow 2 years ago

Posted by Factual_Intelligence 2 years ago
Is this legit? xD There is no way...
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's argument of extinction trumps Con's food argument.