Kurt Angle is a better wrestler (not wwe) than Brock Lesnar.
Debate Rounds (3)
Brock Lesnar went on in his career to become UFC champion, a title which he came to win and defend mostly for his skills with grappling and takedowns, one of the main objectives in amateur wrestling.
After only four fights, Brock Lesnar faced the UFC champion and defeated him by ground striking, which requires expertise in contorting your opponent in a way in which strikes become available. Again, this is due to Lesnar's mastery of amateur wrestling.
Due to his accomplishments in the UFC using mostly elements from his amateur wrestling career, Brock Lesnar is a better wrestler than Kurt Angle.
My opponenet fails to provide any exclusive evidence pertaining to wrestling demonstrating a SUPERIOR skill of Brock Lesnar to that of Kurt Angle. Moreover, it is only conjecture that Brock had won his UFC title as a DIRECT CONSEQUENCE of wrestling criteria.
(2) Kurt Angle possess two NCAA championships, Sophomore year and Senior year at Clarions University.
(1) Kurt Angle possess one World Wrestling Championship gold medal; 1995
(2) Kurt Angle possess one Olympic Gold medal; 1996 Atlanta
Pro wishes for me to provide evidence of my claims. I shall.
Evidence of Brock Lesnar's skill being used in the UFC:
As you can see, takedowns and ground striking were essential to the Champion's rise to power.
And this is a video of Brock Lesnar's UFC Title victory:
As you can also see, the match was won by grounding his opponent, immobilizing him and therefore being able to strike. This is amateur wrestling skill.
Ladies and Gentleman, Brock Lesnar is most obviously the greater of the two. Vote Con.
intellectuallyprimitive forfeited this round.
Pro has forfeited, vote Con.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.