The Instigator
NASCARfan
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
MonetaryOffset
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

Lamborghini kicks Ferrari's butt!

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
MonetaryOffset
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/13/2014 Category: Cars
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 671 times Debate No: 61656
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

NASCARfan

Pro

Basically I just really love the story of Ferruccio Lamborghini. It's cool if you don't agree.
MonetaryOffset

Con

I only have five minutes so this won't be extensive, but I only have a few remarks.

First, Pro is making a categorical statement and has the BOP, but he has not provided any positive arguments sans the fact that he likes one better than the other. Tastes are subjective, and do not establish objectivity, so he has already lost.

Second, cars are not people and thus do not have "butts." Therefore, affirmation is impossible.


Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
NASCARfanMonetaryOffsetTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con gave better arguments.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
NASCARfanMonetaryOffsetTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con rebutted every point pro made, and pro offered no defense. Absolutely no contest.
Vote Placed by ESocialBookworm 2 years ago
ESocialBookworm
NASCARfanMonetaryOffsetTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had the BoP and only stated an opinion, while Con was able to show that cars don't have butts.