The Instigator
luakil
Pro (for)
The Contender
Kalleth
Con (against)

LeafyIsHere is a bad youtuber

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
luakil has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/2/2016 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 7 months ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 276 times Debate No: 95819
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (2)
Votes (0)

 

luakil

Pro

I believe LeafyIsHere is a sub-par youtuber and commentator. Is there anyone interested in challenging me?
Kalleth

Con

I accept the challenge.

Leafyishere is not a "bad youtuber" because bad is inherently a vague and subjective term. If a person doesn't like what he says or if he hurts their feelings, that person will probably say he is a bad youtuber. But this can be said about any content creator. Leafy just happens to be more of a provocateur than most. What can you actually say to prove that he is a "bad" youtuber? I mean, it's the exact same thing as calling him a bad person. Ask yourself, are there really any bad people? And by the most often used meaning of bad, in what way is Leafy an ineffective, broken version of a youtuber?
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 5
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Kalleth 7 months ago
Kalleth
Subjective opinion does not make him an objectively poor youtuber.
Posted by TheBenC 7 months ago
TheBenC
Leafy has no original content. His jokes are not even jokes. He uses "literally" to mean "figuratively". His format is bland and predictable. He goes after little kids just to stir up controversy. He puts tons of filler in his vids just to get to the 10 min mark and make more money. He says things like "grown man" to make a point that a grown man should not do what he did, but leafy is a grown man too and he picks on 7 year olds.
This debate has 6 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.