The Instigator
dukej11
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
1harderthanyouthink
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

Lebron is better than Durant.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
1harderthanyouthink
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/25/2014 Category: Sports
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 590 times Debate No: 46757
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (6)
Votes (3)

 

dukej11

Pro

Lebron James is a better player than Kevin Durant because he has more experience and is more well rounded. He also has a lot better of a personality as well as a better friendship with his players. Finally, he has more rings.
1harderthanyouthink

Con

A basketball player is a basketball player. Experience does not matter in the case of talent. Neither does friendship. If one is better he is better. Why is Durant better? He's younger: which means he can only get better, and LeBron is at the age where athleticism starts to fade. He's a better shooter than LBJ, and stats show Durant is doing better on defense. He's bigger and therefore more versatile when paired with athleticism, passing, rebounding, and shooting. Complete package.
Debate Round No. 1
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by sontesenne05 2 years ago
sontesenne05
lebron no dought
Posted by levijohnamador 2 years ago
levijohnamador
Hello. I just read your post about Kevin Durant and Lebron James. You have a good idea but I'm disagree on what you said. Lebron James is a better player than Kevin Durant because he has more experience and he already prove that he can lead his team in the championship.

Levi John Amador
Contributor, www.ourhappyschool.com
Posted by levijohnamador 2 years ago
levijohnamador
Hello. I just read your post about Kevin Durant and Lebron James. You have a good idea but I'm disagree on what you said. Lebron James is a better player than Kevin Durant because he has more experience and he already prove that he can lead his team in the championship.
Posted by 1harderthanyouthink 2 years ago
1harderthanyouthink
@Zarroette Never mind, I thought you said "his experience made his argument shaky."
Posted by 1harderthanyouthink 2 years ago
1harderthanyouthink
@Zarroette It was my first debate on here. I would have been more formal had there been a larger allowance of words.
Posted by levijohnamador 2 years ago
levijohnamador
ah
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by Wylted 2 years ago
Wylted
dukej111harderthanyouthinkTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had better arguments. I recommend pro include more rounds in future debates, to give himself a fair chance.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
dukej111harderthanyouthinkTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con highlighted the better elements of his player better than Pro did, although the experience argument seemed shaky. Yet this is a 1 round debate, so Pro never showed this frail aspect of Con's argument.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 2 years ago
Krazzy_Player
dukej111harderthanyouthinkTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con made convincing arguments.