Legalizing the Coca plant
Debate Rounds (3)
Also that it doesn't get you high ,like weed does .
"he process to turn it into cocaine is very long and hard"
It may be long and hard (pffft) but it can still be used to produce a very illegal drug.
"takes a large amount to get enough to sell."
It is still possible to sell though. People could have more than one plant you realize.
"t doesn't get you high ,like weed does"
It has been scientifically proven  that cocaine is much more damaging to the brain. It is extremely addictive and much more dangerous.
No space left!
I do not mean cocaine should be legal just the plant its self
Because the process is so long that in America most people would rather make weed.
It takes days to make coca into cocaine
There are so many different chemicals involved in making it that the average person would only be able to make enough for himself . Also it takes a large amount to get enough to sell.
It also has herbal and medicinal uses.
I realize I need more SPACE!!!!!!
Because my opponent has the burden of proof and has failed to provide any proof Con wins this debate.
If you legalize the coca plant, sure the average person would not be able to make enough of it. But people in groups will start coca farms where they can legally grow the coca and produce cocaine illegally.
Because there is not enough space I will conclude with this:
Pro has not refuted any points:
Also it could be a prescription that a doctor gives out to treat small stuff, if the patient wants "organic" relief.
Um I have some unused Vicodin which will make a person loopy.
Be mature;"con wins, con wins" No SMS...
"Traditional medical uses..."
Since when can people grow their own prescription drugs?
"Also it could be a prescription...um I have some unused vicodin...Be mature;....No SMS...."
I have no idea what the bottom half of that paragraph means.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 5 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Pro presented a *very* fragmented argument.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.