The Instigator
Pro (for)
6 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

Legodude123 doesn't have super powers.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/29/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 325 times Debate No: 44873
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)




Round 1 is for acceptance.


How would you know of course I do not understand like I already stated it in my other debates. It is possible for human life forms to have powers. You cant claim people have no powers when you don't define it correctly. Examples
Batman is a human
Super intelligence
Quick reactions.

This basically shows humans can have powers your also not giving any burden of the proof and you must provide info to get me to persuade me.
Debate Round No. 1


My opponent gives example of how Batman is a human yet he still has powers. Unless Con can prove that he too is Batman, this arguments doesn't support his position.

Con must prove that he has stealth, super intelligence, and quick reaction.

My arguments:

There has never been a realistic example of a person who has stealth, super intelligence, and quick reactions. There have been examples of ninjas and samurai training for years upon years to master these three things but this is still human.


Did you just prove my point that I could have super powers? And I said humans can have powers so you are agreeing with my statements.
Debate Round No. 2


Humans[1] can have mutations that give them some rare abilities. However unless my opponent can prove that there are people who can fly without wings/machines or shoot spider webs out of their hand, he loses this debate.



no one said they would have those
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by theta_pinch 2 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:60 
Reasons for voting decision: Con didn't use a period at the end of a sentence in the last round. Pro showed that while some humans have mutations that give them rare abilities those aren't superpowers and that con hasn't proved he has superpowers. Pro was the only one with a source.