Liberals and Multiculturists are hypocrital anti-white racists
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
frozen_eclipse
| Started: | 5/13/2012 | Category: | Politics |
| Updated: | 1 year ago | Status: | Post Voting Period |
| Viewed: | 558 times | Debate No: | 23586 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (2)
|
- Pro-Indigenous rights? EXCEPT when the indigenous people are from Europe. In THAT special case, the indigenous needs to accept their replacement by muslims and africans
- The world is only one? EXCEPT when it applies to whites. In THAT special case "GRINGO GO BACK TO EUROPE" - Karma is a b*tch? EXCEPT when applies to bantues, azteks, mongols, turks, japanese, and basically every other ethnic group, as all the human groups conquered other ethnic groups to survive. Karma is for whites only In order for my opponent to win he must prove both that liberals and multiculturalists in all are hyprocrital, and that both are anti-white racists. If he cannot prove both sides of this resolution then this entire resolution fails bcause the resolution cannot be affirmed unless the entire resolution is proven. Since my opponent offered no structure for this debate i will enact my liberty to do so. 1-acceptance 2-posistions 3-rebuttals/summary Forfeit equals all points to opposing side. |
![]() |
|
I kindly suggest the contender to check the points once more, they are made very clear
If you dont think liberals and multiculturalists are hypocrital, then prove that there are no issues with their general reasoning. That is what the debate is about If you dont know about their policies, I suggest you to check the wikipedia articles or the platforms from the websites of the left-wing parties like Labour (UK), Democratic Party (USA), Socialist Party of France, Socialist party of Italy liberal- is a political ideology or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality...[1] liberals emphsize principles of liberty and reject the ideals of racism. Holding another human being to being nothing but equal to another is not liberal platform........as you see when you look at my sorce it does not support racism...[2] Mlticultural-2. the policy of maintaining a diversity of ethnic cultures Ethnic diversity does not support racism. http://www.debate.org... |
![]() |
|
There lies the hypocrisy
They may say "liberals emphsize principles of liberty and reject the ideals of racism" Yet liberals support affirmative action that discriminates whites, and liberals support most identity politics as long as they are not white "the policy of maintaining a diversity of ethnic cultures" the biggest hypocrisy. how do they accomplish that by importing millions of arabs into europe? They are actually diminish the diversity of the world by turning Europe into Arabia My opponent cannot prove that whites rule the US white- a color resembling snow. A color is not being discriminated against. My opponent cannot prove u that all whites are rich witch would support his false claim. Also liberals are a mix of races including white people and not the color white. Europe will still be Europe. Just like how you pour milk into a glass. is the glass now milk? No the glass is a glass with milk in it. Diversity supports these imports. Pro has failed to prove the resolution. |
![]() |
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by RyozoTabikashi 1 year ago
| Pegasus | frozen_eclipse | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | ![]() | - | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | ![]() | - | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 0 | 5 |
Reasons for voting decision: Con because he made more sense.
Vote Placed by InVinoVeritas 1 year ago
| Pegasus | frozen_eclipse | Tied | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agreed with before the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Agreed with after the debate: | - | - | ![]() | 0 points |
| Who had better conduct: | ![]() | - | - | 1 point |
| Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
| Made more convincing arguments: | - | ![]() | - | 3 points |
| Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
| Total points awarded: | 1 | 3 |
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Pro for lame definition manipulation toward the end. Otherwise, Pro didn't meet the BOP.















No one is actually "white-skinned", it is more like pink anyways
Sounds legit!