Lie Detectors are Effective and Beneficial
Debate Rounds (3)
Round 2: Arguments/Rebuttal
Round 3: Rebuttal/Conclusion
Lie Detectors are terrible.
They are highly ineffective and harmful to all.
Despite the popular belief, lie detectors are not effective at all.
Lie detector, also known as a polygraoh, does not directly detect lies. Rather, they measure physical responses that accompany emotions. The examier notes these responses as one answers questions. Examiners first start with a control question to establish base rates. The examiner determines the truth in the answers by analyzing the rise and fall of these physiological responses.
First of all, the lie detector operates under a false assumption that people remain calm when telling the truths. Its principles iunder which it operates are crude and false. Although lie detectors may look scientific and credible, they are not falseproof. According to the reseach conducted by the American Polygraph Association itself, polygraph was proven accurate only about 80% of time.  This means that 1 in 5 people tested by the lie detectors are falsely accused of crimes. Also, the polygraph accuracy rate at around 65 percent that is only slightly better than the 50 percent correct one would get by flipping a coin.  The rate of inaccuracy is too high for any judicial system to use the results of polygraph as solid evidence.
In addition, many of the questions asked evoke heightened tension and arousal. The questions may be intrusive or accusatory causing some people distressed. The fear of being disbelieved also contribute to the unreliability of polygraphs. When a mother in Yakima, Washington was accused of sexually abusing her step-son, she failed the polygraph test. Upon further investigation, she was asked disturbing and accusatory questions. The accused mother understandably reacted with greater perspiration and blood pressure when asked those types of questions. Fortunately, the mother's attorney located a scientific expert who persuaded the jury that polygraph is not a credible evidence of guilt.  As such there are countless instances of polygraph tests that considered innocent people guilty.
Secondly, polygraph cannot distinguish among anxiety, irritation, and guilt. Studies by psychologiests David Lykken and Leonard Saxe indicate that people's physiological arousal is much the same for most emotions. They go on to state that a polygraph test err approximatel 33% of the time. They criticize that the 'lie detetcting test' actually measures the level of fear and anxiety.  It is a fact that polygraph cannnot distinguish guilt from honest fear.
I eagerly await Pro's arguments and rebuttals.
 Myers, David G.. Psychology. 7th ed. New York: Worth Publishers, 2004. Print.
 Vrij, Aldert. Detecting lies and deceit: pitfalls and opportunities. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley, 2008. Print.
BGreeneID forfeited this round.
Pro has failed to provide any examples nor arguments to back his opinion up.
Lie detectors are ineffective and may be harmful.
It is too inaccurate for them to be used as a solid evidence in the judicial system.
Innocent people may be shown to be guilty and the guilty may be presented as innocent according to the polygraph.
It cannot distinguish between anxiety and guilt, both of which result in changes in perspiration rate, respiration rate and heart rate.
1 in 3 innocent people are shown to be guilty. 33% is an extremely high rate. You could be in that unfortunate 33%.
BGreeneID forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||4||0|
Reasons for voting decision: FF
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.