The Instigator
Pro (for)
3 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

Life is a paradox

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/2/2015 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 918 times Debate No: 74655
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (9)
Votes (1)




(I saw this topic being debated earlier, and felt like giving it a go myself)


Life: What people experience from birth to death.

Paradox: Contrary to expectations, existing belief or perceived opinion.

I will be taking the pro side of debate. My task will be to make a convincing and coherent argument in favor of the resolution
"life is a paradox"

Cons task will be to either poke holes in my argument or make a more convincing argument that expresses why life is not a paradox, or both.

R1 acceptance
R2 opening arguments
R3 rebutalls
R4 closing statements
Good luck to my opponent


life=sensory experience, as im dead without my sense

sensory experiecne=nature

Debate Round No. 1


The idea to be emphasized in this debate will be experience. Life has pretty long list of definitions, from the biological processes to lifestyle. My argument will be focused on what is being experienced. That is why it is defined as it is above,

When we examine opposites and consider what they represent it's safe to say that one denies the others reality. They cannot co-exist- atleast not at the same time.
wet & dry: Nothing can be wet and dry at the same time.
hot & cold: Nothing can be hot and cold at the same time.
up & down: nothing can go up and down at the same time. When something is going up it is impossible for it to be going down as long as its going up.
life & death: Is it possible to be both alive and dead at the same time? Impossible.

However, when we examine experience and consider what is actually taking place it's easy to make a paradoxical connection. It appears that on the level of experience both life & death appear to be happening at once.
From the moment of conception when the sperm meets the egg (fertilization) thus producing an embryo, the process of death is set into motion, not life. While it appears that a newly born person is alive and growing and learning,"living" and it is in many respects. But, it is also aging, everyday is an advance on the inevitable, the inescapable, the thing that cannot be avoided, death.


life is, not was or will be

i can have a stick that is on fire on one end and with the other end solidly placed in an ice blok. i can have a dry rock with a drop of water on it..

life is transformation, death is turn my back.
Debate Round No. 2


It appears that con has no opening argument and fails to point out any flaws in my argument, thus leaving me nothing to rebut.

I'll just use this round to further clarify my argument.

Most people (including myself) have the experience of being "alive" by interacting and responding to the world we live in. We learn, grow, get stronger and wiser. All of this can be characterized as "life". But, the fact of the matter is that the body through which these experiences take place is aging and getting weaker everyday, it's dying. While at times it may appear to be getting stronger the period is short lived and the body consistently advances towards death. Which is precisely why that life as defined in R1 'What people experience from birth to death' is a paradox. People have experiences through the body that is often regarded as "life", but yet it is this same body that is ultimately destined to reach death. That is what makes it a paradox, we seem to be experiencing both life and death at the same time.

Back to con


you are dead without your senses, without sense you cant eat food, or do anything..

as i said, life is transformation, not creation and not destruction
Debate Round No. 3


Again con fails to argue or counter my argument, and fails to bring forth anything to strengthen their side of the debate. I extend my argument.

Vote Pro

Debate Round No. 4
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by Furyan5 3 years ago
Athos is saying that we are living and dying at the same time. That life is paradoxical. VI_spex responded that life is now. The past is history and the future still to come. There is no paradox.
Posted by vi_spex 3 years ago
i dont get your argument sry
Posted by vi_spex 3 years ago
i dont see any
Posted by ATHOS 3 years ago
haven't you read my opening argument? Do you even know what a paradox means? have you any clue at all about what this debate was about?
Posted by vi_spex 3 years ago
where is the paradox
Posted by vi_spex 3 years ago
i have already proven life is sensory experience..
Posted by ATHOS 3 years ago
I'm not sure that con knows their part of the debate.
Posted by vi_spex 3 years ago
yes :)

Posted by Diqiucun_Cunmin 3 years ago
Poor pro...
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Biodome 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con did a laughable job at refuting Pro's arguments, neither did he supply a good case of his own. Con's sentences were neither coherent, nor logical in any way. While I personally don't agree with Pro's position and would gladly argue against him, I must confess that his argument was clearly better structured and convincing than Con's.