Life would be horrible without government
Debate Rounds (3)
2. Murderers walking free without law
3. There would be no freedom'
4. Civilization would fall down
5. There would be no order
6. People would be doing anything and everything
7. A lot of panic would be created
8. No one would be safe
Ok, since there are so many different types of government in the world, I'm going to assume that Pro is talking about the average government, a corrupt, third-world government. (free governments like the USA's or really any first world country's government come far and few in between, and the majority of governments around the world are corrupt)
I will be addressing Pro's arguments one by one-
1. Chaos. (by the way Pro, I'm pretty sure you spelled chaos wrong) Anyway, I know what you are all thinking of a world without government, (stores being looted, people being murdered etc.) but we are assuming (Pro's not saying that life would be horrible if the government fell apart, she's saying life would be horrible without any government at all, ANYWHERE, so that derails a lot of our society today, and the only way that could be possible is if there were no government to begin with) that there was never any government to begin with. Assuming that, life would be very simple. Humans would not have progressed as much as have, there would be no ruling classes to harness the power of slave labor to build the pyramids, to sow and harvest acres of fields, the population would be tiny, since people would not have banded together to pave over acres of forests and inhabit miles of harsh mountain land. You can't do any of that stuff without a lot of people, and a lot of people don't work well together without a leader and a set of rules (a government) so life would be simple. Individual families would probably be living miles apart, farming their own little plots of land, maybe not even that, maybe they would still be hunting and gathering nomads. Life would be simple, and simple lives have no chaos.
2. True, murderers would be walking free without justice, but there would probably be less murderers and murders. Murderers are usually bourne out of stress and hate, and the simple life of a nomad does not produce much stress. Imagine all the mass murders that have happened lately, nothing like 9/11 could not have happened because there would probably be really primitive forms of religion, and people would not learn to hate other religions or cultures because really, if we were all simple nomads there would not be many differences between us. And it would be harder to find people to kill considering that people live so spaced out. People hate because they fear the unknown and what is different, but if they were not to know that anything different ever existed, they could not hate it. But I just want you to know, that in the world today there already isn't that much justice. (at least not in the third-world countries) Today, human slave traffikers and murderers, and rapists already walk free in most parts of the world because the police force isn't effective enough to catch them.
3. On the other hand, it would be ALL freedom. You could do whatever you damn well pleased, there would be no laws to stop you from doing anything.
4.Why would civilization fall down? If there were no government, then there would be no complex civilization to begin with, and the civilizations that existed (families hunting and gathering, occasionally trading) would be extremely stable.
5.True, there would be no order, but that's basically the same as saying chaos, and I already addressed that.
6. See, now you're contradicting yourself. Before, you said that people would not be free, and now you are saying that they could do whatever they want, and isn't that true freedom? Yeah people could do whatever they want, but they wouldn't be able to do much damage. And in most parts of the world, people can already do whatever they want. Gang rape is very common in India, do you call that not doing anything you want? India has a government, and yet people are still doing whatever they want.
7. No not really. The biggest threat to people is other people filled with hate. (and disease, but you can never fully banish disease, and there is already a ton of disease in the world) No, in a world with no government, life would be simple, you are born, you eat, you sleep, you breed, you die. What's there to panic about? Your entire life is laid out for you.
8. True, no one would be safe, nobody will EVER be completely safe. And this nomadic lifestyle is a LOT safer than many of the lives people lead in third world countries. Think about it, if there are no mass populations of people, disease wouldn't be that big a problem. It would claim several families that are part of a trade ring or maybe one of the members joins another family and then die out because it could never reach any other families since people are not completely connected like they are nowadays. I already addressed that there would be less murders. People would be safe from one another.
I look forward to seeing your arguments :)
redhotmama88 forfeited this round.
redhotmama88 forfeited this round.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.