Lindsey Graham would make a better President than Mike Huckabee
Debate Rounds (3)
R4: More Arguments
R5: Rebuttals and conclusion
Mike Huckabee is by far a better candidate for President. He is 59 years old, and served as Governor of Arkansas. Lindsey Graham is only a senator. Huckabee is a saved born again Southern Baptist Christian and as a wide range of support. Graham is not as well known. Huckabee is also very conservative. He is a champion against same sex marriage and abortion. Huckabee is also a former minister which means he could teach the country the word of God in the white house. Huckabee is also very much against common core.
I rest my case, over to my good friend now :)
While working in the House of Representatives, Graham voted for the Defense for marriage act(1996), he was also a member of the Judiciary Committee during the impeachment of Bill Clinton(1998).
Graham has served on four committees:
1. Committee on International Relations: 1995-1998
2. Committee on Education and the Workforce: 1995-2002
3. Committee on the Judiciary: 1997-2002
4. Committee on Armed Services: 1999-2002
Graham cares deeply about America, otherwise, he wouldn't run for President.
He has a prestigious record of service to his nation, this is true.
Graham has served in the military and knows a lot about foreign policy I don't doubt it.
Lindsey Graham is a good candidate, but he is not better than Mike Huck bee.
Mike Huckabee has served I repeat as the Governor of Arkansas.
He also deeply cares for America and is a champion for conservatives.
Huckabee also knows the truth, that"we are moving rapidly toward the criminlization of Christianity."
He is against gay marriage and abortion and is a deep passionate leader for America.
I realize voters may say church and state, but the Southern Baptist minister has the wherewithal as a Christian to lead America forward to at least its 240th birthday and beyond.
I rest my case for this round and thank my friend for his time and the debate :)
GainWisdom forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Hanspete 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||1||1|
Reasons for voting decision: Okay so Conduct goes to Con, because Pro forfeited a round, other than that conduct was fine on both sides. Spelling and Grammar goes to Pro, because although he had fewer arguments than Con did, he made less mistakes than Con did.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.