The Instigator
Loveshismom
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
yomama12
Con (against)
Winning
10 Points

Link would win in a three-way fight with Green Arrow and Hawkeye.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
yomama12
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/9/2014 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 512 times Debate No: 53991
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (4)
Votes (2)

 

Loveshismom

Pro

I will argue that Link would beat Hawkeye and Green Arrow in a three-way fight.
yomama12

Con

You say that Link would beat Hawkeye AND The Green Arrow in a three way fight, so, Hawkeye and the Green Arrow could team up in this fight to defeat Link, and even that Highland Shield wouldn't save Link from barrages of arrows coming from two different directions at once. I will have more evidence to support my theory next round.
Debate Round No. 1
Loveshismom

Pro

Argument 1: If Green Arrow and Hawkeye were attacking him at 6 and 12 o'clock...

Reason 1: Link has a sword to slash normal arrows with. If everybody ran out of arrows, Link could just come up close to Hawkeye or Green Arrow, who had nothing to protect themselves with but their fists and cleave them down with it. Or after bombing a foes whole supply, he could turn around and throw his sword at just the right speed to smack the other foe's bow clean out of his hands but still leave enough time for him to dodge it, thus leaving him vulnerable to one of Link's arrows.

Reason 2: He has a shield. He could protect himself from one foe's arrows with it by holding it behind his back, plus he could repeatedly check behind him to see where the behind-foe was.

Reason 3: He has his own bombs. Therefore, his opponents' explosives would be useless on him, because he could throw them at the other side's arrows. Or he could bomb an opponent's entire bag of arrows to get them out of the picture quickly. His bombs literally never run out. It's as if he's getting them from hammerspace.

Reason 4: Link has a chain. He could wrap an arrow around in it, then swing it around and throw it right back at the enemy who fired it, or he could get close enough and use it to snatch or break one of their bows.

Argument 2: If they were attacking him from the same side...

Reason 5: Link could still use his shield to protect himself from one side's arrows, while throwing bombs and/or whipping them with his chain to stop the rest of them. To reiterate, he could throw a bomb at an enemy's bag of arrows, leaving them out of the picture.

Reason 6: Link could try spinning his chain abruptly. It would create a shield of iron covering his whole front, effectively defending him from the arrows.

Argument 3: If one of them fired a net arrow from behind...

Reason 7: since Link would be holding his shield behind him and constantly checking the enemy's position, the shield would likely be the only thing caught in the net. As for firing an arrow from the front, if one of his bombs didn't already disintegrate the net, he could see the net coming and cut through it with his sword. There is also still the possibility of Link using his chain. It could grab the net just before it could hit Link.
yomama12

Con

How Green Arrow would beat Link:

If you read Green Arrow's wiki page (http://en.wikipedia.org...), you would know that Green Arrow has many more different varieties of arrows to work with, as the article states, "Green Arrow is an archer who invents trick arrows with various special functions, such as glue arrows, diversions (smoke), net, explosive, time bomb, grappling, fire extinguishing, flash, boomerang, tear gas arrows, cryonic arrows and even a kryptonite arrow." So, Green Arrow could shoot a smoke/flash arrow to stun Link, and then finish him off with the explosive/time bomb arrows. If he's feeling really cocky, Green Arrow could also unarm Link with his grappling/ boomerang arrows. As you can see, Green Arrow is a threat to Link, even without Hawkeye's help.

How Hawkeye could beat Link:

In Hawkeye's wiki page (http://en.wikipedia.org...(comics)), It states "While Hawkeye has no superhuman powers (with the exception of the period when using Pym particles to become Goliath), he is at the very peak of human conditioning; he is an exceptional fencer, acrobat and marksman, having been trained from childhood in the circus and by the criminals Trick Shot and Swordsman." He can dodge Link's swings and arrow shots/chains, and then either unarm with acrobatics and take out with an arrow or sword (it did say he was a good fencer, why not?), or use any of his own arrows, as seen in this article: http://en.wikipedia.org.... This cite also shows more of Green Arrow's arrows, which he could also use.

How Green Arrow AND Hawkeye could beat Link as a team:

Pretty self explanatory, as stated by the arguments above.

As you can see, Green Arrow and Hawkeye could beat Link by themselves, so if they teamed up to defeat the tri-force trooper? Well, that's no contest. I await my opponent's response and rebuttals.
Debate Round No. 2
Loveshismom

Pro

Loveshismom forfeited this round.
yomama12

Con

ff, my opponent loses points.
Debate Round No. 3
yomama12

Con

My opponent has not stated another debate round/rebuttal, plus, he said vote CON.
Debate Round No. 4
Loveshismom

Pro

Of course I did.
yomama12

Con

My opponent has not even tried to do another round/rebuttal, so I have already won.
Debate Round No. 5
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by yomama12 2 years ago
yomama12
that makes more sense... :P
Posted by Loveshismom 2 years ago
Loveshismom
I was talking to the other contender. He forfeited, and I reinstated this debate.
Posted by yomama12 2 years ago
yomama12
i didn't forfeit anything!?
Posted by Loveshismom 2 years ago
Loveshismom
How come you forfeited round 1?
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Khaos_Mage 2 years ago
Khaos_Mage
Loveshismomyomama12Tied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit goes to Con, and he actually used sources. Why Pro didn't bring up magic, faeries (not dead), or special items like his cane in Zelda 3 that would create a barrier is beyond me.
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 2 years ago
bladerunner060
Loveshismomyomama12Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Concession, do arguments to con, who did a very good job. I'd give conduct to Pro for an honorable concession as a reward, but he also forfeited so conduct to Con. All other categories deemed equal enough. As always, happy to clarify this RFD.