The Instigator
Logical-Disaster
Con (against)
Losing
13 Points
The Contender
Logical-Master
Pro (for)
Winning
47 Points

Logical-Master Should not close his account

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Con Tied Pro
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/31/2008 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 2,526 times Debate No: 4296
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (12)
Votes (15)

 

Logical-Disaster

Con

I believe that Logical-Master should close his account. He has had a considerable amount of debates on this site and his time has come. The departure of Yraelz supports his departure, for they are the two best debaters on this site (next to beem0r). Also, he has claimed to close his account, and not closing his account would mean that he is a liar, and since lying about yourself on the internet isn't a good thing, he should be forced to close his account.

Logical-Master should close his account.
Logical-Master

Pro

Alright, I'm gonna make my response nice and swift.

First, I would have to dispute this claim that this "Logical-Master" fellow is indeed one of the best debaters on this site. He mostly takes up silly debates and catches his opponent's off guard with cheap tactics. For instance, observe this debate: http://www.debate.org... This is one of the most loaded semantic arguments I have ever seen. There is a reason he is currently losing this debate. Also, look at his recent debate with theLwerd: http://www.debate.org... She caught him dead in his tracks trying to cheat through violating the character/time limit. In no way is Logical-Master one of the best. To Logical-Master, I would have to say "Mada Mada Dane."

Now since him being one of the best was what initiated your claim that he should leave, I have hence proven that he shouldn't leave.

Furthermore, I would have to say that not closing his account wouldn't necessarily make him a liar. After all, he could have very well simply change his mind. Of course, you're free to cross examine him to determine otherwise. ;)

So when considering all of the information, there is really no reason for this Logical-Master fellow to close his account. Rather, he should keep it open and perhaps serve as an incentive for others to get a high number of debates on this website.

And that's all for now.
Debate Round No. 1
Logical-Disaster

Con

I believe that Logical-Master should close his account because I think he should. Prove my theory wrong.
Logical-Master

Pro

Already did in my R1. Am waiting on a refutation. Till then, I suppose I'll settle for a game of "I-spy." I spy something yellow.
Debate Round No. 2
Logical-Disaster

Con

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. This is a tricky one. Quite the tricky one. I'm going to have to say pee.
Logical-Master

Pro

Nope, keep guessing. Once more, ny case does not get addressed, so extend my arguments. Oh, and lets play Marko Polo while we're at it.

MARKO.
Debate Round No. 3
Logical-Disaster

Con

Logical-Master has taken an entire round to not address his own argument. I should win because of this. LM should close his account because I want him to.
Logical-Master

Pro

CON closed her account and has still not rebutted my argument. I win.

Oh, and feel free to vote CON just to vote for the side who clearly lost. I always get a kick out of people doing that. :D
Debate Round No. 4
Logical-Disaster

Con

Logical-Disaster forfeited this round.
Logical-Master

Pro

To quote Seinfield, "These pretzels are making me thirsty." Thus, you know the drill. VOTE whatever position I am (I've honestly forgotten it's been so long).
Debate Round No. 5
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Jamcke 9 years ago
Jamcke
I think Logical-Bastard should be the next clone.
Posted by Pluto2493 9 years ago
Pluto2493
LM, you're doing it all wrong: These pretzels... ARE MAKIN' ME THRISTY!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by DrAlexander 9 years ago
DrAlexander
CON has one vote so far, I could bet that vote was given by LM.lol.
Posted by SweetBags 9 years ago
SweetBags
this was funny, and really brightend my day up.
Posted by LR4N6FTW4EVA 9 years ago
LR4N6FTW4EVA
Marco is spelled wrong...
Posted by beem0r 9 years ago
beem0r
Logical-Raptor:
http://www.screenshots.cc...
Posted by Pluto2493 9 years ago
Pluto2493
OMG I LOLED AGAIN AT LOGICAL-PASTOR THE CROSS HAHA
Posted by Logical-Master 9 years ago
Logical-Master
The clones are multiplying. :O

What's next? Logical Plaster? Logical Masterbatur? Logical Bastur DUH?
Posted by Logical-Pastor 9 years ago
Logical-Pastor
YOUR AN IMPOSTER! GODS WRATH IS UPON YOU!
Posted by Darth_Grievous_42 9 years ago
Darth_Grievous_42
Your Yraelz reincarnate are you not?
15 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Tatarize 8 years ago
Tatarize
Logical-DisasterLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by maddoxparadox 8 years ago
maddoxparadox
Logical-DisasterLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by JBlake 9 years ago
JBlake
Logical-DisasterLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Vote Placed by Robert_Santurri 9 years ago
Robert_Santurri
Logical-DisasterLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by oboeman 9 years ago
oboeman
Logical-DisasterLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by libertarian 9 years ago
libertarian
Logical-DisasterLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by ally93 9 years ago
ally93
Logical-DisasterLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Jamcke 9 years ago
Jamcke
Logical-DisasterLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by InquireTruth 9 years ago
InquireTruth
Logical-DisasterLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by Logical-Master 9 years ago
Logical-Master
Logical-DisasterLogical-MasterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30