The Instigator
DylanAsdale
Pro (for)
Losing
7 Points
The Contender
FalseReality
Con (against)
Winning
36 Points

Logical-Master is extremely annoying and obnoxious.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/17/2008 Category: Society
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 2,370 times Debate No: 5440
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (13)
Votes (8)

 

DylanAsdale

Pro

Logical-Master is extremely annoying and obnoxious.

He makes debates like "the instigator should go out on a debate with Logic-Master", yeah, referring to himself by his username.

His username is extremely irritating and obnoxious as well. A name like logic-master? Please.

Also, he's an Obama supporter. I do not like Obama, and I never have.

He also is a christian, and it's hard to take any christian seriously.
FalseReality

Con

I don't think Logical Master is either annoying or obnoxious

Other people actually make more debates about him than he does:
http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...
(I DID THAT LAST ONE!!!!!)

While to date, Logical Master has made 3 directly about himself
http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...

His name is not irritating at all. I'd rather think or type "Logical Master" than, say
bfitz1307
08suchiyar
uj320
bripur06.11
Not that I have anything against these guys, but really, aren't their names more difficult to pronounce and write? I find that much more annoying.

Okay, so he's an Obama supporter, not everyone's perfect (CHUCK BALDWIN! WHOOO!)

Nothings wrong with being a Christian, it just means you've found a way to preoccupy your spare time. I know if I was a christian, I'd rather spend my time praying than staring at a wall.

SO overall, Logical Master is not extremely annoying or obnoxious, just confused about who really should be president.

On the flip side, it seems extremly annoying to me that you feel the need to go out of your way and make a debate like this. Really, being a troll is about as bad as it gets.
Debate Round No. 1
DylanAsdale

Pro

Your icon is an inverted American flag. This, to me, as a proud American, is extremely annoying and obnoxious by itself. However, this debate is about Logical-Master.

As I know, you are allowed to express opinions on this site. This is my opinion, not an insult. Everyone on here is allowed to make debates about me and express their opinion about me freely, so I will do as I wish in expressing my opinions.

Anyone who claims to support Barack Obama, given the fact that he is not qualified to be President in the slightest, is just extremely obnoxious.

Also, the name "Logical-Master" is very immature, seeing as how his name is supposedly saying that he is a "master of logic". However, he supports Barack Obama for President, therefore, he is not a master of logic.

Also, he has repeatedly insulted me in the past, with no provocation, therefore, he is annoying.
FalseReality

Con

Tell me, how do you not interpret "Logical Master is obnoxious" as an insult? The last time I checked, a deliberate show of disrespect towards someone was called an insult. In the debating community, that's called an "ad Hominid" argument.

How can you base annoyance purely on one's Presidential pick? You don't have to agree on it (I don't) but I hardly think that it's horrible enough to instantly not like someone.

And my name is FalseReality. Does that mean that reality is false? Not necessarily (although it probably is). I see that crazypenguine, Littleweasel, Theskeptic, Astrofan and Ragnar_Rahl are online right now. Do thier screen names have to be exactly on the dot about how they are? I'm sure crazypenguine is not a crazy anthropomorphic penguin, or that Theskeptic really skeptisizes everything. The screen names on this site don't necessarily need to mean anything, they are just there to sound cool. It gives people a chance to vigilantisize themselves from their normal, boring lives. For instance, I work at Staples. I'm a nobody. Logical Master is a __(insert job)__, and people probably don't really notice him. Yet here we can be special, noteworthy, and unique. The screen names just make us into memorable icons that others in this small community can remember us by. Nothing else. I don't see how this is any more annoying pertaining to him than any other person on this site.

I'll need evidence from you to support this argument.
Debate Round No. 2
DylanAsdale

Pro

DylanAsdale forfeited this round.
FalseReality

Con

I like how you forfeited that last round.
Debate Round No. 3
DylanAsdale

Pro

DylanAsdale forfeited this round.
FalseReality

Con

Look at that he did it again! Man my points must be good!
Debate Round No. 4
DylanAsdale

Pro

Your points are not good.
FalseReality

Con

This

debate

is

OVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Debate Round No. 5
13 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by iamadragon 8 years ago
iamadragon
LOL! I have no idea how this is tied.
Posted by beem0r 9 years ago
beem0r
That sounds like giving up to me. Especially when you came back, and rather than rebutting CON's points, you just said "Your points are not good." Come on, man. You can do better than that. Maybe.
Posted by DylanAsdale 9 years ago
DylanAsdale
I didn't give up. I just haven't logged on in a while, and it automatically makes you forfeit if you don't respond in a certain amount of time.
Posted by Logical-Master 9 years ago
Logical-Master
This debate had alot of potential. Too bad he gave up. Objective CON win it seems.
Posted by DylanAsdale 9 years ago
DylanAsdale
I like how he spelled "ad hominem" wrong. Lol.
Posted by Logical-Master 9 years ago
Logical-Master
Oh well. I suppose I'll just have to settle for this one: http://www.debate.org...
Posted by PoeJoe 9 years ago
PoeJoe
Woops. I reported it before I saw your comment. Whoops.
Posted by spinnerclotho 9 years ago
spinnerclotho
This is ridiculous, but also hysterically funny. I'm looking forward to seeing it, too. I'd do it, but I'm not sure how to address something when the topic at hand is an opinion...
Posted by Logical-Master 9 years ago
Logical-Master
I request that no one report this. I wanna see this debate. :D
Posted by Logical-Master 9 years ago
Logical-Master
My reaction to this debate:
8 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 3 years ago
9spaceking
DylanAsdaleFalseRealityTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Vote Placed by DictatorIsaac 7 years ago
DictatorIsaac
DylanAsdaleFalseRealityTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Vote Placed by DylanAsdale 8 years ago
DylanAsdale
DylanAsdaleFalseRealityTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by dvhoose 8 years ago
dvhoose
DylanAsdaleFalseRealityTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by ournamestoolong 8 years ago
ournamestoolong
DylanAsdaleFalseRealityTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by knick-knack 8 years ago
knick-knack
DylanAsdaleFalseRealityTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Vote Placed by JBlake 8 years ago
JBlake
DylanAsdaleFalseRealityTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Logical-Master 9 years ago
Logical-Master
DylanAsdaleFalseRealityTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07