Lok at what your Dr. drives., Where they live, what their wife wears.
Debate Rounds (3)
C'mon doc dick, bring it!
The first point I will go over, is that it is not good to stalk your doctor. Stalking in general is weird.
The second point I will go over is that not all doctors are rich. Their are some awesome nonprofit doctors that help people everyday. Their are also doctors in Hadi and other places helping with people in need their. Also, doctors that live in the US work very hard. They work even more in collage.
Most Dr.s are not likely rich because of the huge debt that they owe to the institution that gave them their power.
Because so many folks are so healthy due to the Dr.'s teachers?
So healthy that the .gov must take control of peoples health?
Why do THEY deserve extra cash in this world of ill health ruled by commies and cappies?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Tie. Both had proper conduct throughout. S&G - Tie. Both had several spelling and grammar issues throughout, thus this balanced out to a tie. Arguments - Con. This was a pretty back n forth discussion, and amounted to Pro posing a challenge to con which was for Con to answer why doctors get so much money. Con answered that question in the final round. Con completed his duty assigned to him by Pro, and thus wins. Sources - Tie. Neither utilized sources in this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.