The Instigator
lailagustina
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Emilrose
Pro (for)
Winning
9 Points

Long work hours for nurses

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
Emilrose
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/19/2015 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 512 times Debate No: 79897
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

lailagustina

Con

Long work hours for nurses isn't good enough because it cause bad impact for their healthy. And also nurses always asks their patients to get enough rest but they didn't do that thing, and about nurses in some country they still didn't respected for everything they did and done. Many people just know if nurses just helping doctor and everything they got it cause the doctor that take care of them. But the fact is nurses did many things for them
Emilrose

Pro

Debate accepted.

Rebuttals and Argument:

Firstly, Con begins their case by stating that:

'Long work hours for nurses isn't good enough because it cause bad impact for their healthy.'

Without providing any evidence on how longer work hours do actually 'impact their healthy'.

'And also nurses always asks their patients to get enough rest but they didn't do that thing, and about nurses in some country they still didn't respected for everything they did and done.'

Once again, absolutely no evidence of proof provided to substantiate this claim. How exactly does Con know the patients 'didn't get their rested'? And how do they know that they 'didn't respected what the (nurses) had did and done'?

Which BTW, actually means the same thing. As with the initial sentences. Con has offered nothing but pointless and seemingly delirium-induced rhetoric. With NO reference to sources and extremely improper grammar.

'Many people just know if nurses just helping doctor and everything they got it cause the doctor that take care of them.'

What? Do feel free to elaborate on that one, as it makes virtually no sense what so ever.

'But the fact is nurses did many things for them.'

And? It is indeed a nurses job to 'do many things' for the people whom they are taking care of.

My mother spent around 18 years working as a nurse and didn't actually 'have to' do long hours. The point is that she was paid very good money for taking care of people and it was a job. Arguing that nurses cannot or should not do long hours is like stating other people in with important jobs that are *necessary* for the public, such as policemen, firelighters, etc. should also not be required to sometimes do 'long hours' in order to fulfill a population's needs.

One thing I would like to point out however is that Con has not even defined what 'long hours' actually are. And once more, the fact that nurses get paid for these hours has evidently been completely overlooked. I'd additionally like to note that with an aging and increasing population, workers such as nurses having to be work longer hours is an inevitably--as is the demand for more trained nurses to do the work.
Debate Round No. 1
lailagustina

Con

lailagustina forfeited this round.
Emilrose

Pro

Mmmmmmmmmmm.
Debate Round No. 2
lailagustina

Con

lailagustina forfeited this round.
Emilrose

Pro

Vote PRO.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by TheQuestionMark 1 year ago
TheQuestionMark
lailagustinaEmilroseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 1 year ago
Midnight1131
lailagustinaEmilroseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
lailagustinaEmilroseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture