Loracs Dream was the Worst
Debate Rounds (3)
There was and can be No worse proposal, except to completely remove the name of God from the Earth and leave it to a Secular doom. This however is not stipulable.
The FACT remains, NO WORSE EVENT has ever been written of or discussed then the atrocity of Lorac's Dream.
Again, with no information being provided whatsoever, it is difficult to decide whether or not there is a worse proposal out there.
If you believe that removing the name of a god from the earth is the worse or second worse proposal to have ever come forth, you should rethink the importance of ritualistic imagination.
The fact remains that no information has been provided for the atrocity of Lorac's Dream.
Hopefully in round 2 you will provide some links, pictures, or videos to help support your claims.
Now. If you couldn't find information you SHOULD not have agreed. However. You didn't even present something that could have been worse that Lorac's Dream. SO you loose again, TROLL.
Because you are still required to DO your homework before CONTRIBUTIING further, as you have transgressed already -
Ps. this is in the miscellaneous section -
I will expect you to put something more horrendous that, and I will ALLUDE tot he Nature of my proposal again, Lorac's Dream.
Regardless, your topic has no information on it whatsoever, so even if I wanted to read up on it, guess what? I can't.
You have commented twice and still have no links or pictures or any information at all.
If anyone is a troll here it is you.
If you want to post some information, go for it. Otherwise, here are some real atrocities that you can research for your next debate.
World War 2, The Cold War, The Genocide of Indigenous Americans, The Slave Trade, Sex Trafficking, The Fukushima Meltdown, The Great Depression, and many more
But I am clearly not the Troll here, You agreed to a debate where you didn't even know what you were saying. that is by definition, Trolling.
You can't research the Dream? well then how can you be so certain I am wrong to stand up as my opponent?
I am not going to share information with you. You cannot argue, nor present contrary facts, and remain not ignorant but arrogantly apposed to the idea.
Seeing as this will be the final Round and I get the last word, I would like to encourage you to be more open and informative in your future arguments.
The Dream cannot be researched as all the search engine's on the internet and the local library have no record on it. This leads me to ask you the question, "How did you research this ever so illusive event?"
I may be ignorant on the nonexistent subject, I may be arrogant thinking that you would provide any sort of clue as to what it is at all, I may know how to spell 'lose' (round 2) and 'opposed' (round 3) the correct way, but claiming 'Lorac's Dream was the worst' puts the burden of proof on you.
What is Lorac's Dream?
Why was it the worst?
How does it contain all the horrendous acts that I provided?
Since the internet has no record of this, how do you?
These are questions that should have been answered in the first two rounds when I asked for you to provide any shred of evidence whatsoever.
Cheers mate, I'll be looking forward to your improved grammar, spelling, and rhetoric in our next debate!
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.