Lunatic asylums should be forced to create multiple income streams
Debate Rounds (2)
What great fun that must have been! Imagine what a lovely time the kiddies would have tormenting the loonies with sticks. And their parents would have a great laugh as well.
However, the management of Bedlam missed the opportunity to charge visitors. Surely families would happily pay enterprising lunatic asylums good money for such a novel amusement?
Furthermore, lunatic asylums could supplement their income from the entrance fees by selling snacks and drinks to the visitors and they could also flog them branded merchandise such as:
* T-shirts with "I've pestered the psychiatric patients at St. Anne's Mental Health Unit" written on them.
* Coffee mugs with "I've hassled the head-cases at Riverview Lodge Secure Hospital" written on them.
* Baseball caps with "I've menaced the mentalists at Sunshine Care Home" written on them.
Lunatic asylums could make even more money by renting inmates out to party organisers - having a few nut-jobs mingling among the crowds at corporate hospitality events, wedding receptions, birthday parties and bar mitzvahs would be hugely entertaining for the guests.
The revenue from these enterprises might not be quite enough to make the lunatic asylums completely self-financing but the extra income would certainly reduce the existing burden on the taxpayer, and the Department of Health should ensure that loony bins diversify into commercial activities in order to create multiple income streams.
1st. Open days are a violation of the right to privacy of the patients, and the suffering inflicted on them by cruel visitors is a definite possibility, especially if they are allowed to touch the patients.
2. Merchandise would trivialize and stigmatize mental illness, which are already heavily stigmatized. Mental illness is no different than physical illness.
Let's replace "mental illness" with "cancer"
I've pestered the cancer patients at St. Anne's Hospital--
This trivializes the suffering of the inmates by making it into a joke, and glorifies the suffering by making it funny. Mental illness is a serious problem and not something to joke about.
3. An inmate could hurt a visitor, which could lead to lawsuits which would defeat the purpose of these measures anyway.
Finally, they destroy the compassion humans must have for each other, even for other people with visible differences.
Nevertheless, I am prepared to defend my position as follows:
1 - Mental patients receive food, accommodation and medication at the taxpayers' expense. They do nothing to pay for it, because they are mentally incapable of working in the conventional sense. However, there is a way they can earn their keep and that is to make themselves available to the paying public and go nuts when the visitors prod them with sticks. Yes, it's an invasion of privacy, but everybody who works in the entertainment industry sacrifices some of their privacy when they go to work: especially porn stars and strippers.
2 - It is true that there's nothing humorous about cancer sufferers but every funny farm has patients who strut about dressed like Napoleon and others who skip around with their hands in the air making whooping noises and all sorts of other weird and wonderful performers: I say if you can't laugh at them then you've got no sense of humour.
3 - I concede that some nutters are dangerous but that's why they invented straight-jackets.
Those people do it willingly, or, if it is unwilling, such as human trafficking, it is a violation of human rights.
2. Yes, but those people who dress like that are not harming anyone. Sure they may be insulting people, but it is not near the level of distaste as it is to poke and prod a live, breathing human for kicks.
3. I'm not sure people want insane and possibly dangerous people at their parties. What about lawsuits?
Finally, this idea is no different than slavery because inmates could not opt out of it and would be unable to do so. Keeping them is not slavery because they would hurt people if they were not kept in that way.
Thus I may conclude my argument. Thanks brian for this humorous debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.