The Instigator
Lil-Boo
Pro (for)
Losing
7 Points
The Contender
Mr.VicePresident
Con (against)
Winning
9 Points

M&M's are better than Skittles

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Mr.VicePresident
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/10/2011 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 2,267 times Debate No: 19221
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (4)

 

Lil-Boo

Pro

M&M's are way better. They have a colorful candy shell, with delicious chocolate in the middle. :)
Mr.VicePresident

Con

i will accept your request for a debate evan though most of this will be purley opinion
Debate Round No. 1
Lil-Boo

Pro

ok but i still think mandm's r netter
Mr.VicePresident

Con

this is pure opinion. skittles are better because they have a variety of flavors. and you know what they say variety is the spice of life!
Debate Round No. 2
No comments have been posted on this debate.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by jm_notguilty 5 years ago
jm_notguilty
Lil-BooMr.VicePresidentTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Counter-votebombing LeoL, but CON won this anyway with the weak 'flavor' argument, and besides, Skittles will always pawn MnMs
Vote Placed by LeoL 5 years ago
LeoL
Lil-BooMr.VicePresidentTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: m
Vote Placed by 000ike 5 years ago
000ike
Lil-BooMr.VicePresidentTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Weak argument from Con, but at least he argued.
Vote Placed by airmax1227 5 years ago
airmax1227
Lil-BooMr.VicePresidentTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Hard to really pick a winner here.. Only thing I can point to is Pro changed his resolution in the 2nd round to M and M's being "netter".. so SandG to Con.